linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Sahara <keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae>,
	"Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@verizon.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fork: Allow stack to be wiped on fork
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:31:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180220163142.15366a82a7bece715b997597@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180117055015.GA15256@beast>

On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 21:50:15 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:

> One of the classes of kernel stack content leaks is exposing the contents
> of prior heap or stack contents when a new process stack is allocated.
> Normally, those stacks are not zeroed, and the old contents remain in
> place. With some types of stack content exposure flaws, those contents
> can leak to userspace. Kernels built with CONFIG_CLEAR_STACK_FORK will
> no longer be vulnerable to this, as the stack will be wiped each time
> a stack is assigned to a new process. There's not a meaningful change
> in runtime performance; it almost looks like it provides a benefit.
> 
> Performing back-to-back kernel builds before:
> 	Run times: 157.86 157.09 158.90 160.94 160.80
> 	Mean: 159.12
> 	Std Dev: 1.54
> 
> With CONFIG_CLEAR_STACK_FORK=y:
> 	Run times: 159.31 157.34 156.71 158.15 160.81
> 	Mean: 158.46
> 	Std Dev: 1.46
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -904,6 +904,14 @@ config VMAP_STACK
>  	  the stack to map directly to the KASAN shadow map using a formula
>  	  that is incorrect if the stack is in vmalloc space.
>  
> +config CLEAR_STACK_FORK
> +	bool "Clear the kernel stack at each fork"
> +	help
> +	  To resist stack content leak flaws, this clears newly allocated
> +	  kernel stacks to keep previously freed heap or stack contents
> +	  from being present in the new stack. This has almost no
> +	  measurable performance impact.
> +

It would be much nicer to be able to control this at runtime rather
than compile-time.  Why not a /proc tunable?  We could always use more
of those ;)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-21  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-17  5:50 [PATCH] fork: Allow stack to be wiped on fork Kees Cook
2018-01-17  9:17 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-19 19:16   ` [kernel-hardening] " Laura Abbott
2018-01-26 22:01 ` Jiri Kosina
2018-01-26 22:31   ` Jiri Kosina
2018-02-21  0:31 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2018-02-21  1:56   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-02-22  9:47     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180220163142.15366a82a7bece715b997597@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).