linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] hugetlb: fix surplus pages accounting
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:14:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180221191439.GM2231@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180221042457.uolmhlmv5je5dqx7@xps>

OK, so here we go with the fix.

>From bc55c70ca2325f3305a80cfca5731f9550205589 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:47:33 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] hugetlb: fix surplus pages accounting

Dan Rue has noticed that libhugetlbfs test suite fails counter test:

root@localhost:~# mount_point="/mnt/hugetlb/"
root@localhost:~# echo 200 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
root@localhost:~# mkdir -p "${mount_point}"
root@localhost:~# mount -t hugetlbfs hugetlbfs "${mount_point}"
root@localhost:~# export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/root/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs-2.20/obj64
root@localhost:~# /root/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs-2.20/tests/obj64/counters
Starting testcase "/root/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs-2.20/tests/obj64/counters", pid 3319
Base pool size: 0
Clean...
FAIL    Line 326: Bad HugePages_Total: expected 0, actual 1

The bug was bisected to 0c397daea1d4 ("mm, hugetlb: further simplify
hugetlb allocation API"). The reason is that alloc_surplus_huge_page misaccounts
per node surplus pages. We should increase surplus_huge_pages_node rather than
nr_huge_pages_node which is already handled by alloc_fresh_huge_page.

Fixes: 0c397daea1d4 ("mm, hugetlb: further simplify hugetlb allocation API")
Reported-by: Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 7c204e3d132b..a963f2034dfc 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1583,7 +1583,7 @@ static struct page *alloc_surplus_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 		page = NULL;
 	} else {
 		h->surplus_huge_pages++;
-		h->nr_huge_pages_node[page_to_nid(page)]++;
+		h->surplus_huge_pages_node[page_to_nid(page)]++;
 	}
 
 out_unlock:
-- 
2.16.1

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-21 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-03  9:32 [PATCH 0/6] mm, hugetlb: allocation API and migration improvements Michal Hocko
2018-01-03  9:32 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm, hugetlb: unify core page allocation accounting and initialization Michal Hocko
2018-01-03  9:32 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm, hugetlb: integrate giga hugetlb more naturally to the allocation path Michal Hocko
2018-01-03  9:32 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm, hugetlb: do not rely on overcommit limit during migration Michal Hocko
2018-01-03  9:32 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm, hugetlb: get rid of surplus page accounting tricks Michal Hocko
2018-01-03  9:32 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm, hugetlb: further simplify hugetlb allocation API Michal Hocko
2018-02-21  4:24   ` Dan Rue
2018-02-21  9:55     ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-21 10:01       ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-21 16:19         ` Dan Rue
2018-02-21 18:52           ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-21 19:05             ` Dan Rue
2018-02-21 17:59         ` Mike Kravetz
2018-02-21 18:54           ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-21 19:14     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-01-03  9:32 ` [PATCH 6/6] hugetlb, mempolicy: fix the mbind hugetlb migration Michal Hocko
2018-01-04  0:05 ` [PATCH 0/6] mm, hugetlb: allocation API and migration improvements Andrew Morton
2018-01-04  7:32   ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180221191439.GM2231@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.rue@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).