linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Cc: <eric.auger@redhat.com>, <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	<xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] vfio/type1: Add IOVA range capability support
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:54:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180222155429.32e71de2@w520.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180221122209.9292-6-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>

On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:22:08 +0000
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> wrote:

> This  allows the user-space to retrieve the supported IOVA
> range(s), excluding any reserved regions. The implementation
> is based on capability chains, added to VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO ioctl.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h       | 23 +++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 111 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 3049393..c08adb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -1917,6 +1917,68 @@ static int vfio_domains_have_iommu_cache(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int vfio_iommu_iova_add_cap(struct vfio_info_cap *caps,
> +		 struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_iova_range *cap_iovas,
> +		 size_t size)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_info_cap_header *header;
> +	struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_iova_range *iova_cap;
> +
> +	header = vfio_info_cap_add(caps, size,
> +				VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_IOVA_RANGE, 1);
> +	if (IS_ERR(header))
> +		return PTR_ERR(header);
> +
> +	iova_cap = container_of(header,
> +			struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_iova_range, header);
> +	iova_cap->nr_iovas = cap_iovas->nr_iovas;
> +	memcpy(iova_cap->iova_ranges, cap_iovas->iova_ranges,
> +		cap_iovas->nr_iovas * sizeof(*cap_iovas->iova_ranges));
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_iommu_iova_build_caps(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> +				struct vfio_info_cap *caps)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_iova_range *cap_iovas;
> +	struct vfio_iova *iova;
> +	size_t size;
> +	int iovas = 0, i = 0, ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(iova, &iommu->iova_list, list)
> +		iovas++;
> +
> +	if (!iovas) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	size = sizeof(*cap_iovas) + (iovas * sizeof(*cap_iovas->iova_ranges));
> +
> +	cap_iovas = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cap_iovas) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	cap_iovas->nr_iovas = iovas;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(iova, &iommu->iova_list, list) {
> +		cap_iovas->iova_ranges[i].start = iova->start;
> +		cap_iovas->iova_ranges[i].end = iova->end;
> +		i++;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = vfio_iommu_iova_add_cap(caps, cap_iovas, size);
> +
> +	kfree(cap_iovas);
> +out_unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  				   unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  {
> @@ -1938,6 +2000,8 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  		}
>  	} else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO) {
>  		struct vfio_iommu_type1_info info;
> +		struct vfio_info_cap caps = { .buf = NULL, .size = 0 };
> +		int ret;
>  
>  		minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_info, iova_pgsizes);
>  
> @@ -1951,6 +2015,30 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  
>  		info.iova_pgsizes = vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu);
>  
> +		ret = vfio_iommu_iova_build_caps(iommu, &caps);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		if (caps.size) {
> +			info.flags |= VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_CAPS;
> +
> +			if (info.argsz < sizeof(info) + caps.size) {
> +				info.argsz = sizeof(info) + caps.size;

There's still a corner case here where the user could have provided an
argsz including cap_offset, potentially including uninitialized user
data, and it becomes more error prone not to zero that field for this
case.  I'd suggest this:

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index a1ce8853caf1..d9ea69e62c46 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -2105,16 +2105,25 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
 	} else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO) {
 		struct vfio_iommu_type1_info info;
 		struct vfio_info_cap caps = { .buf = NULL, .size = 0 };
+		unsigned long capsz;
 		int ret;
 
 		minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_info, iova_pgsizes);
 
+		/* For backward compatibility, cannot require this */
+		capsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_info, cap_offset);
+
 		if (copy_from_user(&info, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
 			return -EFAULT;
 
 		if (info.argsz < minsz)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
+		if (info.argsz >= capsz) {
+			minsz = capsz;
+			info.cap_offset = 0; /* output, no-recopy necessary */
+		}
+
 		info.flags = VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_PGSIZES;
 
 		info.iova_pgsizes = vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu);
@@ -2136,13 +2145,12 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
 					kfree(caps.buf);
 					return -EFAULT;
 				}
-				minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_info,
-							   cap_offset);
 				info.cap_offset = sizeof(info);
 			}
 
 			kfree(caps.buf);
 		}
+
 		return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &info, minsz) ?
 			-EFAULT : 0;
 


If you approve and there are no other comments, I can roll that change
into this patch as-is.  Thanks,

Alex

> +			} else {
> +				vfio_info_cap_shift(&caps, sizeof(info));
> +				if (copy_to_user((void __user *)arg +
> +						sizeof(info), caps.buf,
> +						caps.size)) {
> +					kfree(caps.buf);
> +					return -EFAULT;
> +				}
> +				minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_info,
> +							   cap_offset);
> +				info.cap_offset = sizeof(info);
> +			}
> +
> +			kfree(caps.buf);
> +		}
>  		return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &info, minsz) ?
>  			-EFAULT : 0;
>  
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index c743721..46b49e9 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -589,7 +589,30 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_info {
>  	__u32	argsz;
>  	__u32	flags;
>  #define VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_PGSIZES (1 << 0)	/* supported page sizes info */
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_CAPS	(1 << 1)	/* Info supports caps */
>  	__u64	iova_pgsizes;		/* Bitmap of supported page sizes */
> +	__u32   cap_offset;	/* Offset within info struct of first cap */
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * The IOVA capability allows to report the valid IOVA range(s)
> + * excluding any reserved regions associated with dev group. Any dma
> + * map attempt outside the valid iova range will return error.
> + *
> + * The structures below define version 1 of this capability.
> + */
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_IOVA_RANGE  1
> +
> +struct vfio_iova_range {
> +	__u64	start;
> +	__u64	end;
> +};
> +
> +struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_iova_range {
> +	struct vfio_info_cap_header header;
> +	__u32	nr_iovas;
> +	__u32	reserved;
> +	struct vfio_iova_range iova_ranges[];
>  };
>  
>  #define VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 12)

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-22 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-21 12:22 [PATCH v4 0/6] vfio/type1: Add support for valid iova list management Shameer Kolothum
2018-02-21 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] vfio/type1: Introduce iova list and add iommu aperture validity check Shameer Kolothum
2018-02-21 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] vfio/type1: Check reserve region conflict and update iova list Shameer Kolothum
2018-02-21 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] vfio/type1: Update iova list on detach Shameer Kolothum
2018-02-21 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] vfio/type1: check dma map request is within a valid iova range Shameer Kolothum
2018-02-26 22:05   ` Auger Eric
2018-02-26 23:13     ` Alex Williamson
2018-02-27  8:26       ` Auger Eric
2018-02-27  9:57         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2018-02-27 17:13           ` Alex Williamson
2018-02-28  9:02           ` Auger Eric
2018-02-28  9:25             ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2018-02-28 11:53               ` Auger Eric
2018-02-28 13:39                 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2018-02-28 15:32                   ` Auger Eric
2018-02-28 15:24                 ` Alex Williamson
2018-03-02 13:19                   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2018-03-02 16:04                     ` Alex Williamson
2018-03-02 17:16                       ` Robin Murphy
2018-03-05 11:44                         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2018-03-14 18:12                           ` Robin Murphy
2018-03-08  9:35                         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2018-02-27 16:57         ` Alex Williamson
2018-02-27 12:40       ` Robin Murphy
2018-02-21 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] vfio/type1: Add IOVA range capability support Shameer Kolothum
2018-02-22 22:54   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2018-02-23 10:56     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2018-02-21 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] vfio/type1: remove duplicate retrieval of reserved regions Shameer Kolothum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180222155429.32e71de2@w520.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).