From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
oleg@redhat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/10] trace: Eliminate cond_resched_rcu_qs() in favor of cond_resched()
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 07:36:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180227153646.GD3777@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180226212920.43e25d6e@vmware.local.home>
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 09:29:20PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 10:39:44 -0800
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hmmm... Grasping at straws... Could we make cond_resched() be something
> > > like a tracepoint and instrument them with cond_resched_rcu_qs() if the
> > > current RCU-tasks grace period ran for more that (say) a minute of its
> > > ten-minute stall-warning span?
> >
> > On the other hand, you noted in your other email that the tracepoint
> > benchmark should not be enabled on production systems. So how about
> > the following (again untested) patch? The "defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU)"
> > might need to change, especially if RCU-tasks is used in production
> > kernels, but perhaps a starting point.
>
> RCU tasks are used in production systems if PREEMPT is enabled (it
> allows for optimizations with ftrace, perf and kprobes).
>
> But the tracepoint is not used.
Right, so I should use defined(CONFIG_TRACEPOINT_BENCHMARK) instead of
defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU).
Or am I misinterpreting the code in kernel/trace?
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index b161ef8a902e..316c29c5e506 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -1589,6 +1589,12 @@ static inline int test_tsk_need_resched(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > */
> > #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> > extern int _cond_resched(void);
> > +#elif defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU)
> > +static inline int _cond_resched(void)
> > +{
> > + rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > #else
> > static inline int _cond_resched(void) { return 0; }
> > #endif
>
>
> This does work, but so does the below, without causing cond_resched()
> from being something other than a nop of CONFIG_PREEMPT.
True, but based on the cond_resched_rcu_qs() experience, I bet that
trace_benchmark.c won't be the only place needing help.
Thanx, Paul
> -- Steve
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/trace_benchmark.c
> index 22fee766081b..82d83bb4874b 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_benchmark.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_benchmark.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ static int benchmark_event_kthread(void *arg)
> * block synchronize_rcu_tasks() indefinitely.
> */
> cond_resched();
> + rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current);
> }
>
> return 0;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-27 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-01 19:21 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/10] Don not IPI offline CPUs, de-emphasize cond_resched_rcu_qs() Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/10] sched: Stop resched_cpu() from sending IPIs to offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/10] sched: Stop switched_to_rt() " Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/10] netfilter: Eliminate cond_resched_rcu_qs() in favor of cond_resched() Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/10] mm: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/10] workqueue: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-02 1:06 ` Lai Jiangshan
2017-12-04 18:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/10] trace: " Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-24 20:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-02-25 17:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-25 18:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-25 18:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-27 2:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-02-27 15:36 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-02-28 23:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-01 1:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-01 5:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-01 20:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-02 20:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-03 0:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 4:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-02-26 5:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/10] softirq: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/10] fs: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/10] doc: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/10] rcu: Account for rcu_all_qs() in cond_resched() Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-02 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-02 12:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-02 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-24 20:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-02-25 17:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180227153646.GD3777@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).