From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932587AbeCBUG1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2018 15:06:27 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33072 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932131AbeCBUG0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2018 15:06:26 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 40978217A4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rostedt@goodmis.org Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 15:06:21 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/10] trace: Eliminate cond_resched_rcu_qs() in favor of cond_resched() Message-ID: <20180302150621.069d1443@vmware.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20180301204858.GH3777@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1512156104-20104-6-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180224151240.0d63a059@vmware.local.home> <20180225174927.GC2855@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180225181730.GA3963@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180225183944.GA8840@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180226212920.43e25d6e@vmware.local.home> <20180227153646.GD3777@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180228181252.55e0590c@vmware.local.home> <20180301012144.GX3777@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180301000404.64828a0e@vmware.local.home> <20180301204858.GH3777@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 12:48:58 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > So how about I rename cond_resched_rcu_qs() to cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(), > which at least gives a hint as to where it needs to be used? > > Would that work for you? Yes, definitely! -- Steve