linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Use the proper lockdep annotation in dump_blkd_tasks()
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 18:47:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180312014709.GL3918@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180309013224.23890-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:32:18AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Sparse reported this:
> 
> | kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:814:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different modifiers)
> | kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:814:9:    expected struct lockdep_map const *lock
> | kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:814:9:    got struct lockdep_map [noderef] *<noident>
> 
> This is caused by using vanilla lockdep annotations on rcu_node::lock,
> and that requires accessing ->lock of rcu_node directly. However we need
> to keep rcu_node::lock __private to avoid breaking its extra ordering
> guarantee. And we have a dedicated lockdep annotation for
> rcu_node::lock, so use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>

Good eyes!  Queued both this and v3 for testing and further review.

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 9accacffd138..ea33f57abae5 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static void dump_blkd_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp, int ncheck)
>  	int i;
>  	struct list_head *lhp;
> 
> -	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
> +	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
>  	pr_info("%s: grp: %d-%d level: %d ->qamask %#lx ->gp_tasks %p ->boost_tasks %p ->exp_tasks %p &->blkd_tasks: %p offset: %u\n", __func__, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, rnp->level, rnp->qsmask, rnp->gp_tasks, rnp->boost_tasks, rnp->exp_tasks, &rnp->blkd_tasks, (unsigned int)offsetof(typeof(*rnp), blkd_tasks));
>  	pr_cont("\t->blkd_tasks");
>  	i = 0;
> -- 
> 2.16.2
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2018-03-12  1:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-09  1:32 [PATCH] rcu: Use the proper lockdep annotation in dump_blkd_tasks() Boqun Feng
2018-03-12  1:47 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180312014709.GL3918@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).