From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753214AbeCNInf (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 14 Mar 2018 04:43:35 -0400
Received: from mail-lf0-f67.google.com ([209.85.215.67]:35980 "EHLO
        mail-lf0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751228AbeCNInd (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 14 Mar 2018 04:43:33 -0400
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsR6Lu2lttZyUeukgIv5KXuCu9rm1ehkKk+56rmvZLucibi/HaLRniPhOzhby5jt/9xUxWrZg==
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:43:29 +0300
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
        Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab, slub: remove size disparity on debug kernel
Message-ID: <20180314084329.y7735ecw2is5i5pd@esperanza>
References: <20180313165428.58699-1-shakeelb@google.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803131217200.9367@nuc-kabylake>
 <CALvZod4qa39QJqCr3n6UqzdD6pfLAQ3Rix6zm9_1pQkfQCDa7Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALvZod4qa39QJqCr3n6UqzdD6pfLAQ3Rix6zm9_1pQkfQCDa7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:36:52AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> >
> >> However for SLUB in debug kernel, the sizes were same. On further
> >> inspection it is found that SLUB always use kmem_cache.object_size to
> >> measure the kmem_cache.size while SLAB use the given kmem_cache.size. In
> >> the debug kernel the slab's size can be larger than its object_size.
> >> Thus in the creation of non-root slab, the SLAB uses the root's size as
> >> base to calculate the non-root slab's size and thus non-root slab's size
> >> can be larger than the root slab's size. For SLUB, the non-root slab's
> >> size is measured based on the root's object_size and thus the size will
> >> remain same for root and non-root slab.
> >
> > Note that the object_size and size may differ for SLUB based on kernel
> > parameters and slab configuration. For SLAB these are compilation options.
> >
> 
> Thanks for the explanation.
> 
> >> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ struct kmem_cache *find_mergeable(unsigned int size, unsigned int align,
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  static struct kmem_cache *create_cache(const char *name,
> >> -             unsigned int object_size, unsigned int size, unsigned int align,
> >> +             unsigned int object_size, unsigned int align,
> >>               slab_flags_t flags, unsigned int useroffset,
> >
> > Why was both the size and object_size passed during cache creation in the
> > first place? From the flags etc the slab logic should be able to compute
> > the actual bytes required for each object and its metadata.
> >
> 
> +Vladimir
> 
> I think it was introduced by 794b1248be4e7 ("memcg, slab: separate
> memcg vs root cache creation paths") but I could not find out the
> reason.

This was a mistake - I missed that __kmem_cache_create() overwrites
kmem_cache->size. Thanks for fixing this.