From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>, tglx@linutronix.de, Dmitry.Prohorov@intel.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, acme@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org, vincent.weaver@maine.edu, kan.liang@intel.com, eranian@google.com, davidcc@google.com, valery.cherepennikov@intel.com, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] perf/core: clear sibling list of detached events (was "Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix sibling iteration") Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:17:41 +0000 Message-ID: <20180316131741.3svgr64yibc6vsid@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20180316105017.GD4064@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:50:17AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:39:46AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:31:29AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > There is at least one more known issue with that patch, but neither Mark > > > nor me could reproduce so far, so we don't know if we're right about the > > > cause. > > > > is there more info about that issue? I could try it > > Find below, 0day report didn't go out to lkml. We think moving the > list_del_init() out from the !RB_NODE_EMPTY() test might fix, but since > we can't repro so far, its all guesses. In testing, I can see this always fires after we perf_group_detach() a leader whose group_node is empty. With the list_del_init() pulled out of that check, I see that we still hit the leaders with an empty group_node (with a hacked-in WARN_ON), but no longer blow up in a subsequent perf_group_detach(). I've given this 50 boots with the 0day scripts, and no explosions so far (with 5 boots where a leader had an empty group_node). Thanks, Mark. ---->8---- >From 136ebe0f3756d4cf1a37f6d00b7ec1b902980b83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:51:40 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] perf/core: clear sibling list of detached events When perf_group_dettach() is called on a group leader, it updates each sibling's group_leader field to point to that sibling, effectively upgrading each siblnig to a group leader. After perf_group_detach has completed, the caller may free the leader event. We only remove siblings from the group leader's sibling_list when the leader has a non-empty group_node. This was fine prior to commit: 8343aae66167df67 ("perf/core: Remove perf_event::group_entry") ... as the sibling's sibling_list would be empty. However, now that we use the sibling_list field as both the list head and the list entry, this leaves each sibling with a non-empty sibling list, including the stale leader event. If perf_group_detach() is subsequently called on a sibling, it will appear to be a group leader, and we'll walk the sibling_list, potentially dereferencing these stale events. In 0day testing, this has been observed to result in kernel panics. Let's avoid this by always removing siblings from the sibling list when we promote them to leaders. Fixes: 8343aae66167df67 ("perf/core: Remove perf_event::group_entry") Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> --- kernel/events/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index 9a07bbe66451..627814e1820d 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -1917,12 +1917,12 @@ static void perf_group_detach(struct perf_event *event) list_for_each_entry_safe(sibling, tmp, &event->sibling_list, sibling_list) { sibling->group_leader = sibling; + list_del_init(&sibling->sibling_list); /* Inherit group flags from the previous leader */ sibling->group_caps = event->group_caps; if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&event->group_node)) { - list_del_init(&sibling->sibling_list); add_event_to_groups(sibling, event->ctx); } -- 2.11.0
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <tip-8343aae66167df6708128a778e750d48dbe31302@git.kernel.org> 2018-03-15 17:01 ` [PATCH] perf: Fix sibling iteration Peter Zijlstra 2018-03-16 9:59 ` Alexey Budankov 2018-03-16 10:31 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-03-16 10:39 ` Jiri Olsa 2018-03-16 10:50 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-03-16 12:07 ` Mark Rutland 2018-03-16 13:17 ` Mark Rutland [this message] 2018-03-16 13:44 ` [PATCH] perf/core: clear sibling list of detached events (was "Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix sibling iteration") Peter Zijlstra 2018-03-16 14:37 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/core: Clear sibling list of detached events tip-bot for Mark Rutland 2018-03-16 19:49 ` tip-bot for Mark Rutland 2018-03-16 10:53 ` [PATCH] perf: Fix sibling iteration Alexey Budankov 2018-03-16 14:36 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra 2018-03-16 19:49 ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20180316131741.3svgr64yibc6vsid@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \ --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=Dmitry.Prohorov@intel.com \ --cc=acme@redhat.com \ --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \ --cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \ --cc=davidcc@google.com \ --cc=eranian@google.com \ --cc=hpa@zytor.com \ --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \ --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@kernel.org \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=valery.cherepennikov@intel.com \ --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0 lkml/git/0.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1 lkml/git/1.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2 lkml/git/2.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/3 lkml/git/3.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4 lkml/git/4.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5 lkml/git/5.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6 lkml/git/6.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7 lkml/git/7.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8 lkml/git/8.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/9 lkml/git/9.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml \ linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org public-inbox-index lkml Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git