From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751583AbeCTSsP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:48:15 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:54093 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751269AbeCTSsM (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:48:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 19:47:59 +0100 From: Maxime Ripard To: Icenowy Zheng Cc: Rob Herring , Chen-Yu Tsai , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] arm64: allwinner: a64: add DE2 CCU related device tree nodes Message-ID: <20180320184759.nb2zwn5liqa2kpm4@flea> References: <20180316175354.21437-1-icenowy@aosc.io> <20180316175354.21437-6-icenowy@aosc.io> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: <20180316175354.21437-6-icenowy@aosc.io> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180223 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 01:53:52AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > + sram-controller@1c00000 { > + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-sram-controller"; > + reg = <0x01c00000 0x1000>; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + ranges; > + > + sram_c: sram@18000 { > + compatible = "mmio-sram"; > + reg = <0x00018000 0x28000>; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + ranges = <0 0x00018000 0x28000>; > + > + de2_sram: sram-section@0 { > + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-sram-c"; > + reg = <0x0000 0x28000>; > + }; > + }; > + }; > + > syscon: syscon@1c00000 { > compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-system-controller", > "syscon"; Isn't that the same device than the sram controller node you just added? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com