linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: security@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@fb.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, jannh@google.com,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bcrl@kvack.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, kent.overstreet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] HMM: Remove superflous RCU protection around radix tree lookup
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:54:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180326145431.GC1840639@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180314194515.1661824-4-tj@kernel.org>

Hello, Andrew.

Do you mind picking up the following patch?  I can't find a good tree
to route this through.  The raw patch can be found at

  https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=152105674112496&q=raw

Thank you very much.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:45:11PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> hmm_devmem_find() requires rcu_read_lock_held() but there's nothing
> which actually uses the RCU protection.  The only caller is
> hmm_devmem_pages_create() which already grabs the mutex and does
> superflous rcu_read_lock/unlock() around the function.
> 
> This doesn't add anything and just adds to confusion.  Remove the RCU
> protection and open-code the radix tree lookup.  If this needs to
> become more sophisticated in the future, let's add them back when
> necessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> Hello,
> 
> Jérôme, how do you want to route this patch?  If you prefer, I can
> route it together with other patches.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>  mm/hmm.c | 12 ++----------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index 320545b98..d4627c5 100644
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> @@ -845,13 +845,6 @@ static void hmm_devmem_release(struct device *dev, void *data)
>  	hmm_devmem_radix_release(resource);
>  }
>  
> -static struct hmm_devmem *hmm_devmem_find(resource_size_t phys)
> -{
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
> -
> -	return radix_tree_lookup(&hmm_devmem_radix, phys >> PA_SECTION_SHIFT);
> -}
> -
>  static int hmm_devmem_pages_create(struct hmm_devmem *devmem)
>  {
>  	resource_size_t key, align_start, align_size, align_end;
> @@ -892,9 +885,8 @@ static int hmm_devmem_pages_create(struct hmm_devmem *devmem)
>  	for (key = align_start; key <= align_end; key += PA_SECTION_SIZE) {
>  		struct hmm_devmem *dup;
>  
> -		rcu_read_lock();
> -		dup = hmm_devmem_find(key);
> -		rcu_read_unlock();
> +		dup = radix_tree_lookup(&hmm_devmem_radix,
> +					key >> PA_SECTION_SHIFT);
>  		if (dup) {
>  			dev_err(device, "%s: collides with mapping for %s\n",
>  				__func__, dev_name(dup->device));
> -- 
> 2.9.5
> 

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-26 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-14 19:41 [PATCHSET v2] percpu_ref, RCU: Audit RCU usages in percpu_ref users Tejun Heo
2018-03-14 19:45 ` [PATCH 1/8] fs/aio: Add explicit RCU grace period when freeing kioctx Tejun Heo
2018-03-14 19:45   ` [PATCH 2/8] fs/aio: Use RCU accessors for kioctx_table->table[] Tejun Heo
2018-03-14 19:45   ` [PATCH 3/8] RDMAVT: Fix synchronization around percpu_ref Tejun Heo
2018-03-15 22:24     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-03-14 19:45   ` [PATCH 4/8] HMM: Remove superflous RCU protection around radix tree lookup Tejun Heo
2018-03-26 14:54     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-03-27 16:12       ` Jerome Glisse
2018-03-14 19:45   ` [PATCH 5/8] percpu_ref: Update doc to dissuade users from depending on internal RCU grace periods Tejun Heo
2018-03-19 17:10     ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-14 19:45   ` [PATCH 6/8] RCU, workqueue: Implement rcu_work Tejun Heo
2018-03-14 20:13     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-16  6:01     ` Lai Jiangshan
2018-03-19 16:45       ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-20 10:04         ` Lai Jiangshan
2018-03-14 19:45   ` [PATCH 7/8] cgroup: Use rcu_work instead of explicit rcu and work item Tejun Heo
2018-03-14 19:45   ` [PATCH 8/8] fs/aio: " Tejun Heo
2018-03-19 17:12     ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-21 15:58     ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-03-21 16:40       ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-21 17:17         ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-03-21 17:53           ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-22 11:24             ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-03-26 15:04               ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-27 14:28                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-03-27 15:55                   ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-29 16:49                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-03-29 17:41                       ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180326145431.GC1840639@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=security@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).