From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752851AbeC2OHx (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:07:53 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58508 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752496AbeC2OHw (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:07:52 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 69F4D2175B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=frederic@kernel.org Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:07:49 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: LKML , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Tony Luck , "David S . Miller" , Michael Ellerman , Helge Deller , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Fenghua Yu , "James E . J . Bottomley" , schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] softirq: Remove __ARCH_SET_SOFTIRQ_PENDING Message-ID: <20180329140748.GB12958@lerouge> References: <1522290425-22844-1-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org> <1522290425-22844-11-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org> <20180329071619.GO4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20180329134745.GA12958@lerouge> <20180329140111.GC4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180329140111.GC4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 04:01:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:47:46PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 09:16:19AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 04:27:05AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > The last user of __ARCH_SET_SOFTIRQ_PENDING has been converted to generic > > > > per-cpu softirq mask. We can now remove this conditional. > > > > > > This seems like half a cleanup; who still has local_softirq_pending() > > > after this? > > > > Only s390 because it uses lowcore to store such cpu data. > > Is it worth keeping it there? It seems an aweful shame to keep this > stuff special cased for just the one arch. At the very least this > should've mentioned s390 is special and why. Right, I thought well about moving that special case to s390. I can do that in v2. > > And I don't see s390 people on Cc either. Oops, forgot to add them. Thanks.