linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] x86/entry/64: extend register clearing on syscall entry to lower registers
Date: Thu,  5 Apr 2018 11:53:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180405095307.3730-8-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180405095307.3730-1-linux@dominikbrodowski.net>

To reduce the chance that random user space content leaks down the call
chain in registers, also clear lower registers on syscall entry:

For 64-bit syscalls, extend the register clearing in PUSH_AND_CLEAR_REGS
to %dx and %cx. This should not hurt at all, also on the other callers
of that macro. We do not need to clear %rdi and %rsi for syscall entry,
as those registers are used to pass the parameters to do_syscall_64().

For the 32-bit compat syscalls, do_int80_syscall_32() and
do_fast_syscall_32() each only take one parameter. Therefore, extend the
register clearing to %dx, %cx, and %si in entry_SYSCALL_compat and
entry_INT80_compat.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
---
 arch/x86/entry/calling.h         | 2 ++
 arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S | 6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
index be63330c5511..352e70cd33e8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
@@ -114,7 +114,9 @@ For 32-bit we have the following conventions - kernel is built with
 	pushq   %rsi		/* pt_regs->si */
 	.endif
 	pushq	\rdx		/* pt_regs->dx */
+	xorl	%edx, %edx	/* nospec   dx */
 	pushq   %rcx		/* pt_regs->cx */
+	xorl	%ecx, %ecx	/* nospec   cx */
 	pushq   \rax		/* pt_regs->ax */
 	pushq   %r8		/* pt_regs->r8 */
 	xorl	%r8d, %r8d	/* nospec   r8 */
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S
index 08425c42f8b7..9af927e59d49 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S
@@ -220,8 +220,11 @@ GLOBAL(entry_SYSCALL_compat_after_hwframe)
 	pushq	%rax			/* pt_regs->orig_ax */
 	pushq	%rdi			/* pt_regs->di */
 	pushq	%rsi			/* pt_regs->si */
+	xorl	%esi, %esi		/* nospec   si */
 	pushq	%rdx			/* pt_regs->dx */
+	xorl	%edx, %edx		/* nospec   dx */
 	pushq	%rbp			/* pt_regs->cx (stashed in bp) */
+	xorl	%ecx, %ecx		/* nospec   cx */
 	pushq	$-ENOSYS		/* pt_regs->ax */
 	pushq   $0			/* pt_regs->r8  = 0 */
 	xorl	%r8d, %r8d		/* nospec   r8 */
@@ -365,8 +368,11 @@ ENTRY(entry_INT80_compat)
 
 	pushq	(%rdi)			/* pt_regs->di */
 	pushq	%rsi			/* pt_regs->si */
+	xorl	%esi, %esi		/* nospec   si */
 	pushq	%rdx			/* pt_regs->dx */
+	xorl	%edx, %edx		/* nospec   dx */
 	pushq	%rcx			/* pt_regs->cx */
+	xorl	%ecx, %ecx		/* nospec   cx */
 	pushq	$-ENOSYS		/* pt_regs->ax */
 	pushq   $0			/* pt_regs->r8  = 0 */
 	xorl	%r8d, %r8d		/* nospec   r8 */
-- 
2.16.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-05  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-05  9:52 [PATCH 0/8] use struct pt_regs based syscall calling for x86-64 Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-05  9:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86: don't pointlessly reload the system call number Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-06 17:09   ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/syscalls: Don't " tip-bot for Linus Torvalds
2018-04-05  9:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] syscalls: introduce CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-06 17:10   ` [tip:x86/asm] syscalls/core: Introduce CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER=y tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-05  9:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] syscalls/x86: use struct pt_regs based syscall calling for 64-bit syscalls Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-06 17:11   ` [tip:x86/asm] syscalls/x86: Use 'struct pt_regs' based syscall calling convention " tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-05  9:53 ` [PATCH 4/8] syscalls: prepare ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER for compat syscalls Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-06 17:11   ` [tip:x86/asm] syscalls/core: Prepare CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER=y " tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-05  9:53 ` [PATCH 5/8] syscalls/x86: use struct pt_regs based syscall calling for IA32_EMULATION and x32 Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-06 17:12   ` [tip:x86/asm] syscalls/x86: Use 'struct pt_regs' " tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-05  9:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] syscalls/x86: unconditionally enable struct pt_regs based syscalls on x86_64 Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-06 17:12   ` [tip:x86/asm] syscalls/x86: Unconditionally enable 'struct pt_regs' " tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-05  9:53 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2018-04-06 17:13   ` [tip:x86/asm] syscalls/x86: Extend register clearing on syscall entry to lower registers tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-05  9:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] syscalls/x86: rename struct pt_regs-based sys_*() to __sys_x86_*() Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-05 18:35   ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-05 15:19 ` [PATCH 0/8] use struct pt_regs based syscall calling for x86-64 Ingo Molnar
2018-04-05 20:31   ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-06  8:23     ` Ingo Molnar
2018-04-06  8:31       ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-06  8:34       ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-06  9:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2018-04-06  9:34           ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-06 12:34             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-04-06 13:07               ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-04-06 17:03                 ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180405095307.3730-8-linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).