linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, mst@redhat.com,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, jasowang@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] vhost: fix vhost_vq_access_ok() log check
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:26:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180410052630.11270-2-stefanha@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180410052630.11270-1-stefanha@redhat.com>

Commit d65026c6c62e7d9616c8ceb5a53b68bcdc050525 ("vhost: validate log
when IOTLB is enabled") introduced a regression.  The logic was
originally:

  if (vq->iotlb)
      return 1;
  return A && B;

After the patch the short-circuit logic for A was inverted:

  if (A || vq->iotlb)
      return A;
  return B;

This patch fixes the regression by rewriting the checks in the obvious
way, no longer returning A when vq->iotlb is non-NULL (which is hard to
understand).

Reported-by: syzbot+65a84dde0214b0387ccd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 5320039671b7..93fd0c75b0d8 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -1244,10 +1244,12 @@ static int vq_log_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
 /* Caller should have vq mutex and device mutex */
 int vhost_vq_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
 {
-	int ret = vq_log_access_ok(vq, vq->log_base);
+	if (!vq_log_access_ok(vq, vq->log_base))
+		return 0;
 
-	if (ret || vq->iotlb)
-		return ret;
+	/* Access validation occurs at prefetch time with IOTLB */
+	if (vq->iotlb)
+		return 1;
 
 	return vq_access_ok(vq, vq->num, vq->desc, vq->avail, vq->used);
 }
-- 
2.14.3

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-10  5:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-10  5:26 [PATCH v2 0/2] vhost: fix vhost_vq_access_ok() log check Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-04-10  5:26 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2018-04-10 13:22   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-10 13:27     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-10  5:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] vhost: return bool from *_access_ok() functions Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-04-10 13:29   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-10  6:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] vhost: fix vhost_vq_access_ok() log check Jason Wang
2018-04-10 14:50   ` David Miller
2018-04-11  1:21     ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180410052630.11270-2-stefanha@redhat.com \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).