From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, samuel@sortiz.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, johan@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: irda: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in stir421x_fw_upload
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 09:07:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180411070742.GE10795@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523410174-1553-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> stir421x_fw_upload() is never called in atomic context.
>
> The call chain ending up at stir421x_fw_upload() is:
> [1] stir421x_fw_upload() <- stir421x_patch_device() <- irda_usb_probe()
>
> irda_usb_probe() is set as ".probe" in struct usb_driver.
> This function is not called in atomic context.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context, stir421x_fw_upload()
> calls mdelay() to busily wait.
> This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to
> avoid busy waiting.
>
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
> And I also manually check it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
This all looks good (also note the call to usb_control_msg(), which may
sleep, just above the mdelay()).
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Johan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-11 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-11 1:29 [PATCH 1/2] staging: irda: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in stir421x_fw_upload Jia-Ju Bai
2018-04-11 6:41 ` Greg KH
2018-04-11 7:17 ` Jia-Ju Bai
2018-04-11 8:03 ` Greg KH
2018-04-11 8:11 ` Jia-Ju Bai
2018-04-11 8:17 ` Greg KH
2018-04-11 8:20 ` Jia-Ju Bai
2018-04-11 14:26 ` David Miller
2018-04-11 14:30 ` Jia-Ju Bai
2018-04-11 7:07 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180411070742.GE10795@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samuel@sortiz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).