From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq/schedutil: Cleanup, document and fix iowait boost
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:24:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180411145407.GQ7671@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180411143921.GP14248@e110439-lin>
On 11-04-18, 15:39, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> On 11-Apr 12:58, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:44:45AM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > > > > - sugov_set_iowait_boost: is now in charge only to set/increase the IO
> > > > > wait boost, every time a task wakes up from an IO wait.
> > > > >
> > > > > - sugov_iowait_boost: is now in charge to reset/reduce the IO wait
> > > > > boost, every time a sugov update is triggered, as well as
> > > > > to (eventually) enforce the currently required IO boost value.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sold on those function names; feels like we can do better,
> > > > although I'm struggling to come up with anything sensible just now.
> > >
> > > What about something like:
> > >
> > > sugov_iowait_init()
> > > since here we are mainly initializing the iowait boost
> > >
> > > sugov_iowait_boost()
> > > since here we are mainly applying the proper boost to each cpu
> > >
> > > Although they are not really so different...
> >
> > How about:
> >
> > sugov_iowait_boost() -- does the actual impulse/boost
> > sugov_iowait_apply() -- applies the boost state
> >
> > ?
>
> Whould say it can work too, and it also allows to add a:
>
> sugov_iowait_reset() -- resets boots state after
> TICK_NSEC CPU idle time
>
> Viresh, Rafael, Joel: any preferences or other suggestions?
Looks like no matter how we rename it, someone will find it confusing
:)
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-11 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-10 15:59 [PATCH v2] cpufreq/schedutil: Cleanup, document and fix iowait boost Patrick Bellasi
2018-04-10 19:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-11 10:44 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-04-11 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-11 14:39 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-04-11 14:54 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2018-04-11 4:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-04-11 10:48 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-04-11 14:44 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180411145407.GQ7671@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=smuckle@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).