From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Cyrus-Session-Id: sloti22d1t05-3269524-1523477660-2-17212114332705041916 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 3.0 X-Spam-known-sender: no X-Spam-score: 0.0 X-Spam-hits: BAYES_00 -1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI -1, ME_NOAUTH 0.01, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI -5, LANGUAGES en, BAYES_USED global, SA_VERSION 3.4.0 X-Spam-source: IP='209.132.180.67', Host='vger.kernel.org', Country='US', FromHeader='org', MailFrom='org' X-Spam-charsets: plain='UTF-8' X-Resolved-to: greg@kroah.com X-Delivered-to: greg@kroah.com X-Mail-from: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; d=messagingengine.com; s=fm2; t= 1523477659; b=Eo9WzaPmYuveXEXa3qfrIufmyJ4gnZS+xRtPPKjZZbFZcF7BQi mXCnoU6VsyHs1ZXQjgoIHdbPTWwoM0FHb3tzL4N91gGP4MoFU38fjzKN7JVxmVTH z3xspOvY/IwfUs0I0IogMr5t9gjkmnZQpk+f96IHQjMjAh6R7rikvO9eh6Jp+uyp pok5TfB0hL2IflyDEJjOCxB9zssz85l1ySWEWhrjEH9Luq6/37yfoRM0ThI7RxmV ic9L2UUhzS8MSP1ynO6hIDz6UW4BaQYe7MYwKWbERZcx11QjkxT0BqDJfduaVASg J5JE+IcSmT1atiw0S30kNFuGmVYDcYjXaCWg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:sender :list-id; s=fm2; t=1523477659; bh=4giLyN1ztE2Xhok6dk7y+26g9Jrr8j 7m4wNtvbHZB68=; b=NBx3iQjR4wFlcsnqXSQPGn9Z98FQ11IxqwgMOr5mxqrHQ4 DFrpfjkBemGPmDE9X3a/Ho1L5XDcamElu/ThDbZhHwH299gyqxPMSYuugDOBdOF2 jYfxvUD9KPjSzpYLn+LO47C/meVXTtwg8NMQQbX7Alg0dH+/48WkC9PmDuuA7oOi tsZJHygmXWTxIMXydj1GWIvdWUf4cum8ckDwFaQDPm2NBNYKoXLs8SwY4xYP4RmH 0/z3l2zWSfst2kUawN3NsWgBwayy402NG99nmvbDfixGBDC2eVkZ3DfkIs2bKFgC pl3qkr9fpVfI/2got3qwWpV2y0K4543N192SB/UA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx3.messagingengine.com; arc=none (no signatures found); dkim=none (no signatures found); dmarc=none (p=none,has-list-id=yes,d=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org; iprev=pass policy.iprev=209.132.180.67 (vger.kernel.org); spf=none smtp.mailfrom=stable-owner@vger.kernel.org smtp.helo=vger.kernel.org; x-aligned-from=fail; x-cm=none score=0; x-ptr=pass x-ptr-helo=vger.kernel.org x-ptr-lookup=vger.kernel.org; x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=vger.kernel.org smtp.result=pass smtp_org.domain=kernel.org smtp_org.result=pass smtp_is_org_domain=no header.domain=linuxfoundation.org header.result=pass header_is_org_domain=yes; x-vs=clean score=-100 state=0 Authentication-Results: mx3.messagingengine.com; arc=none (no signatures found); dkim=none (no signatures found); dmarc=none (p=none,has-list-id=yes,d=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org; iprev=pass policy.iprev=209.132.180.67 (vger.kernel.org); spf=none smtp.mailfrom=stable-owner@vger.kernel.org smtp.helo=vger.kernel.org; x-aligned-from=fail; x-cm=none score=0; x-ptr=pass x-ptr-helo=vger.kernel.org x-ptr-lookup=vger.kernel.org; x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=vger.kernel.org smtp.result=pass smtp_org.domain=kernel.org smtp_org.result=pass smtp_is_org_domain=no header.domain=linuxfoundation.org header.result=pass header_is_org_domain=yes; x-vs=clean score=-100 state=0 X-ME-VSCategory: clean X-CM-Envelope: MS4wfBrp19MafUt78l9ZBXOU1W79jt4gEdvZOo23mQgsclBjbl1eRSeAY4XGqr7BNl2cVtZlGg31MFxAZImsaHU8lpsTuqAbLHR+eZGVxkPoXoIAWil5D7F4 AbmkK2fxHgEK49T4V7fAUy8p6/0OQIHg2TrTIkeUs/b7MpZBT7FaB6KkSkomf2srx7rDn0BUWOdcpu3TLE6ZROHKIb8it3htLQepIl9In+kfAPMp9ysq36ZK X-CM-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=Tq3Iegfh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=UK1r566ZdBxH71SXbqIOeA==:117 a=UK1r566ZdBxH71SXbqIOeA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=Kd1tUaAdevIA:10 a=3-RhneuVAAAA:8 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=ag1SF4gXAAAA:8 a=WoP9IM0tYB0b0HWQNkIA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=VLVLkjT_5ZicWzSuYqSo:22 a=Yupwre4RP9_Eg_Bd0iYG:22 X-ME-CMScore: 0 X-ME-CMCategory: none Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933317AbeDKSxl (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:53:41 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33900 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933299AbeDKSxi (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:53:38 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Rabin Vincent , Pavel Shilovsky , Steve French , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.9 027/310] CIFS: silence lockdep splat in cifs_relock_file() Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:32:46 +0200 Message-Id: <20180411183623.461438905@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180411183622.305902791@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180411183622.305902791@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Rabin Vincent [ Upstream commit 560d388950ceda5e7c7cdef7f3d9a8ff297bbf9d ] cifs_relock_file() can perform a down_write() on the inode's lock_sem even though it was already performed in cifs_strict_readv(). Lockdep complains about this. AFAICS, there is no problem here, and lockdep just needs to be told that this nesting is OK. ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 4.11.0+ #20 Not tainted --------------------------------------------- cat/701 is trying to acquire lock: (&cifsi->lock_sem){++++.+}, at: cifs_reopen_file+0x7a7/0xc00 but task is already holding lock: (&cifsi->lock_sem){++++.+}, at: cifs_strict_readv+0x177/0x310 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&cifsi->lock_sem); lock(&cifsi->lock_sem); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 1 lock held by cat/701: #0: (&cifsi->lock_sem){++++.+}, at: cifs_strict_readv+0x177/0x310 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 701 Comm: cat Not tainted 4.11.0+ #20 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x85/0xc2 __lock_acquire+0x17dd/0x2260 ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c ? preempt_schedule_irq+0x6b/0x80 lock_acquire+0xcc/0x260 ? lock_acquire+0xcc/0x260 ? cifs_reopen_file+0x7a7/0xc00 down_read+0x2d/0x70 ? cifs_reopen_file+0x7a7/0xc00 cifs_reopen_file+0x7a7/0xc00 ? printk+0x43/0x4b cifs_readpage_worker+0x327/0x8a0 cifs_readpage+0x8c/0x2a0 generic_file_read_iter+0x692/0xd00 cifs_strict_readv+0x29f/0x310 generic_file_splice_read+0x11c/0x1c0 do_splice_to+0xa5/0xc0 splice_direct_to_actor+0xfa/0x350 ? generic_pipe_buf_nosteal+0x10/0x10 do_splice_direct+0xb5/0xe0 do_sendfile+0x278/0x3a0 SyS_sendfile64+0xc4/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbe Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent Acked-by: Pavel Shilovsky Signed-off-by: Steve French Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/cifs/file.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/cifs/file.c +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ cifs_relock_file(struct cifsFileInfo *cf struct cifs_tcon *tcon = tlink_tcon(cfile->tlink); int rc = 0; - down_read(&cinode->lock_sem); + down_read_nested(&cinode->lock_sem, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); if (cinode->can_cache_brlcks) { /* can cache locks - no need to relock */ up_read(&cinode->lock_sem);