From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753706AbeDROZJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:25:09 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38948 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752659AbeDROZI (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:25:08 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CF394204EF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rostedt@goodmis.org Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:25:04 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: Song Liu , LKML , kernel-team , Ingo Molnar , Howard McLauchlan , Josef Bacik , Srikar Dronamraju Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: fix bad use of igrab in trace_uprobe.c Message-ID: <20180418102504.7673a7f3@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20180418062907.3210386-1-songliubraving@fb.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:03:42 +0200 Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > @@ -937,7 +928,8 @@ probe_event_enable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct trace_event_file *file, > > goto err_flags; > > > > tu->consumer.filter = filter; > > - ret = uprobe_register(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer); > > + ret = uprobe_register(d_inode(tu->path.dentry), tu->offset, > > + &tu->consumer); > > It is not entirely clear how the lifetime of uprobe relates to the > lifetime of trace_uprobe. Is the uprobe object never going to survive > its creator trace_uprobe object? Not exactly sure what you mean here. The trace_uprobe (the probe event) is created, it doesn't do anything until it is enabled. This function is called when it is enabled. The trace_uprobe (probe event) can not be deleted while it is enabled (EBUSY). Are you asking what happens if the file is deleted while it has probe? That I don't know about (haven't tried it out). But I would hope that it keeps a reference to the inode, isn't that what the igrab is for? And is now being replaced by a reference on the path, or is that the problem? -- Steve > > If that's the case, it warrants a comment. If that's not the case, > then the path would need to be passed to uprobe_resister() which would > need to obtain its own reference. > > > if (ret) > > goto err_buffer; > >