From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] printk: wake up klogd in vprintk_emit
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 17:02:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180418150214.z7oyughldrktj6e4@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180418102943.5aa0ffc4@gandalf.local.home>
On Wed 2018-04-18 10:29:43, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 12:01:45 +0900
> Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > @@ -1888,6 +1888,7 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk_emit(int facility, int level,
> >
> > printed_len = log_output(facility, level, lflags, dict, dictlen, text, text_len);
> >
> > + wake_up_klogd();
> > logbuf_unlock_irqrestore(flags);
>
> You can't do this, because the scheduler can call printk_deferred()
> with the rq lock held, and printk_deferred() will grab the logbuf lock.
>
> Calling wake_up_klogd() will grab the rq lock and give us a A-B<->B-A
> locking order.
wake_up_klogd() uses the lockless irq_work_queue(). So it is actually
safe.
But the name is confusing. We should rename it.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-18 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-14 3:01 [PATCH 2/2] printk: wake up klogd in vprintk_emit Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-04-18 14:04 ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-19 1:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-04-19 9:54 ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-18 14:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-04-18 15:02 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2018-04-18 15:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-04-19 1:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-04-19 1:42 ` [PATCHv2] " Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-04-19 10:02 ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-20 1:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-04-20 8:18 ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-25 13:23 ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-26 1:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180418150214.z7oyughldrktj6e4@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).