From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752321AbeDTEnE (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:43:04 -0400
Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:40353 "EHLO
        mail-pf0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751012AbeDTEnC (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:43:02 -0400
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/CQ6E79xCKaQEuBKvp9C1+vKUJEYdELxLe+YQL1q7t4LM7Sw+M/DMD70wlux0B6bl4AKoLTQ==
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 10:12:59 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Markus Mayer <code@mmayer.net>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
        Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>,
        Broadcom Kernel List <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
        Power Management List <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: prefer SCMI cpufreq if
 supported
Message-ID: <20180420044259.GA2873@vireshk-i7>
References: <20180418155643.36464-1-code@mmayer.net>
 <20180418155643.36464-3-code@mmayer.net>
 <20180419041632.GF24576@vireshk-i7>
 <74b70865-dfa9-25c8-20f8-3d2f722b9b2d@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <74b70865-dfa9-25c8-20f8-3d2f722b9b2d@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 19-04-18, 11:37, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 19/04/18 05:16, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 18-04-18, 08:56, Markus Mayer wrote:
> >> From: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> If the SCMI cpufreq driver is supported, we bail, so that the new
> >> approach can be used.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c
> >> index b07559b9ed99..b4861a730162 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c
> >> @@ -164,6 +164,8 @@
> >>  #define BRCM_AVS_CPU_INTR	"brcm,avs-cpu-l2-intr"
> >>  #define BRCM_AVS_HOST_INTR	"sw_intr"
> >>  
> >> +#define ARM_SCMI_COMPAT		"arm,scmi"
> >> +
> >>  struct pmap {
> >>  	unsigned int mode;
> >>  	unsigned int p1;
> >> @@ -511,6 +513,20 @@ static int brcm_avs_prepare_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>  	struct device *dev;
> >>  	int host_irq, ret;
> >>  
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * If the SCMI cpufreq driver is supported, we bail, so that the more
> >> +	 * modern approach can be used.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL)) {
> >> +		struct device_node *np;
> >> +
> >> +		np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, ARM_SCMI_COMPAT);
> >> +		if (np) {
> >> +			of_node_put(np);
> >> +			return -ENXIO;
> >> +		}
> >> +	}
> >> +
> > 
> > What about adding !CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL in Kconfig dependency and don't
> > compile the driver at all ?
> > 
> 
> Unfortunately, that may not be good idea with single image needing both
> configs to be enabled.

Sure, but looking at the above code, it looked like they don't need the other
config if SCMI is enabled.

-- 
viresh