From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] vfio: ccw: Suppressing the BOXED state
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:44:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180425104429.582618f8.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524149293-12658-10-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:48:12 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> VFIO_CCW_STATE_BOXED and VFIO_CCW_STATE_BUSY are the same
> states.
> Let's only keep one: VFIO_CCW_STATE_BUSY
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 9 ---------
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
I think they were initially supposed to cover two different things:
- BUSY: we're currently dealing with an I/O request
- BOXED: the device currently won't talk to us or we won't talk to it
It seems we never really did anything useful with BOXED; but should we?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-25 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-19 14:48 [PATCH 00/10] vfio: ccw: Refactoring the VFIO CCW state machine Pierre Morel
2018-04-19 14:48 ` [PATCH 01/10] vfio: ccw: Moving state change out of IRQ context Pierre Morel
[not found] ` <20180424065442.GV12194@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-04-24 8:40 ` Pierre Morel
2018-04-24 9:59 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-24 11:49 ` Pierre Morel
2018-04-24 11:55 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-24 13:07 ` Pierre Morel
2018-04-24 16:42 ` Halil Pasic
2018-04-25 6:57 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-25 11:06 ` Halil Pasic
2018-04-30 13:56 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-19 14:48 ` [PATCH 02/10] vfio: ccw: Transform FSM functions to return state Pierre Morel
[not found] ` <20180424072550.GW12194@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-04-24 8:22 ` Pierre Morel
2018-04-30 13:58 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-19 14:48 ` [PATCH 03/10] vfio: ccw: new SCH_EVENT event Pierre Morel
2018-04-25 8:25 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-25 13:54 ` Pierre Morel
[not found] ` <20180426065954.GP5428@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-04-30 15:28 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-04 8:25 ` Pierre Morel
2018-04-19 14:48 ` [PATCH 04/10] vfio: ccw: replace IO_REQ event with SSCH_REQ event Pierre Morel
2018-04-25 8:41 ` Cornelia Huck
[not found] ` <24f638e4-2f7e-00e1-1efb-ff3fe524bca0@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-04-30 15:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-03 12:06 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-22 15:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-23 8:19 ` Pierre Morel
[not found] ` <20180426073053.GZ12194@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20180426074806.GB12194@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-04-30 15:33 ` Cornelia Huck
[not found] ` <20180502074622.GV5428@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-05-02 8:22 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-03 14:26 ` Pierre Morel
[not found] ` <20180504011916.GA26081@bjsdjshi@linux.ibm.com>
2018-05-04 11:02 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-22 15:41 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-23 7:50 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-23 8:10 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-19 14:48 ` [PATCH 05/10] vfio: ccw: Suppress unused event parameter Pierre Morel
[not found] ` <20180426073618.GA12194@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-05-03 10:34 ` Pierre Morel
2018-04-19 14:48 ` [PATCH 06/10] vfio: ccw: Make FSM functions atomic Pierre Morel
2018-04-19 14:48 ` [PATCH 07/10] vfio: ccw: Introduce the INIT event Pierre Morel
2018-04-30 15:39 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-03 10:31 ` Pierre Morel
2018-04-19 14:48 ` [PATCH 08/10] vfio: ccw: Handling reset and shutdown with states Pierre Morel
2018-04-30 15:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-19 14:48 ` [PATCH 09/10] vfio: ccw: Suppressing the BOXED state Pierre Morel
2018-04-25 8:44 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-04-25 13:55 ` Pierre Morel
2018-04-30 15:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-03 9:02 ` Pierre Morel
2018-04-19 14:48 ` [PATCH 10/10] vfio: ccw: Let user wait when busy on IO Pierre Morel
2018-04-25 8:48 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-25 14:00 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180425104429.582618f8.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).