[PATCH 4.9 30/74] KVM: s390: wire up bpb feature

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>


From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 35b3fde6203b932b2b1a5b53b3d8808abc9c4f60 ]

The new firmware interfaces for branch prediction behaviour changes
are transparently available for the guest. Nevertheless, there is
new state attached that should be migrated and properly resetted.
Provide a mechanism for handling reset, migration and VSIE.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
[Changed capability number to 152. - Radim]
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    3 ++-
 arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |    5 ++++-
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         |   13 ++++++++++++-
 arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c             |   10 ++++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/kvm.h         |    1 +
 5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -181,7 +181,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_sie_block {
 	__u16	ipa;			/* 0x0056 */
 	__u32	ipb;			/* 0x0058 */
 	__u32	scaoh;			/* 0x005c */
-	__u8	reserved60;		/* 0x0060 */
+#define FPF_BPBC 	0x20
+	__u8	fpf;			/* 0x0060 */
 	__u8	ecb;			/* 0x0061 */
 	__u8    ecb2;                   /* 0x0062 */
 #define ECB3_AES 0x04
--- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ struct kvm_guest_debug_arch {
 #define KVM_SYNC_VRS    (1UL << 6)
 #define KVM_SYNC_RICCB  (1UL << 7)
 #define KVM_SYNC_FPRS   (1UL << 8)
+#define KVM_SYNC_BPBC	(1UL << 10)
 /* definition of registers in kvm_run */
 struct kvm_sync_regs {
 	__u64 prefix;	/* prefix register */
@@ -217,7 +218,9 @@ struct kvm_sync_regs {
 	};
 	__u8  reserved[512];	/* for future vector expansion */
 	__u32 fpc;		/* valid on KVM_SYNC_VRS or KVM_SYNC_FPRS */
-	__u8 padding[52];	/* riccb needs to be 64byte aligned */
+	__u8 bpbc : 1;		/* bp mode */
+	__u8 reserved2 : 7;
+	__u8 padding1[51];	/* riccb needs to be 64byte aligned */
 	__u8 riccb[64];		/* runtime instrumentation controls block */
 };
 
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -401,6 +401,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct
 	case KVM_CAP_S390_RI:
 		r = test_facility(64);
 		break;
+	case KVM_CAP_S390_BPB:
+		r = test_facility(82);
+		break;
 	default:
 		r = 0;
 	}
@@ -1713,6 +1716,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *
 	kvm_s390_set_prefix(vcpu, 0);
 	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 64))
 		vcpu->run->kvm_valid_regs |= KVM_SYNC_RICCB;
+	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 82))
+		vcpu->run->kvm_valid_regs |= KVM_SYNC_BPBC;
 	/* fprs can be synchronized via vrs, even if the guest has no vx. With
 	 * MACHINE_HAS_VX, (load|store)_fpu_regs() will work with vrs format.
 	 */
@@ -1829,7 +1834,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu
 	if (test_fp_ctl(current->thread.fpu.fpc))
 		/* User space provided an invalid FPC, let's clear it */
 		current->thread.fpu.fpc = 0;
-
 	save_access_regs(vcpu->arch.host_acrs);
 	restore_access_regs(vcpu->run->s.regs.acrs);
 	gmap_enable(vcpu->arch.enabled_gmap);
@@ -1877,6 +1881,7 @@ static void kvm_s390_vcpu_initial_reset(
 	current->thread.fpu.fpc = 0;
 	vcpu->arch.sie_block->gbea = 1;
 	vcpu->arch.sie_block->pp = 0;
+	vcpu->arch.sie_block->fpf &= ~FPF_BPBC;
 	vcpu->arch.pfault_token = KVM_S390_PFAULT_TOKEN_INVALID;
 	kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue(vcpu);
 	if (!kvm_s390_user_cpu_state_ctrl(vcpu->kvm))
@@ -2744,6 +2749,11 @@ static void sync_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *v
 		if (riccb->valid)
 			vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb3 |= 0x01;
 	}
+	if ((kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_BPBC) &&
+	    test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 82)) {
+		vcpu->arch.sie_block->fpf &= ~FPF_BPBC;
+		vcpu->arch.sie_block->fpf |= kvm_run->s.regs.bpbc ? FPF_BPBC : 0;
+	}
 
 	kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0;
 }
@@ -2762,6 +2772,7 @@ static void store_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *
 	kvm_run->s.regs.pft = vcpu->arch.pfault_token;
 	kvm_run->s.regs.pfs = vcpu->arch.pfault_select;
 	kvm_run->s.regs.pfc = vcpu->arch.pfault_compare;
+	kvm_run->s.regs.bpbc = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->fpf & FPF_BPBC) == FPF_BPBC;
 }
 
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
@@ -217,6 +217,12 @@ static void unshadow_scb(struct kvm_vcpu
 	memcpy(scb_o->gcr, scb_s->gcr, 128);
 	scb_o->pp = scb_s->pp;
 
+	/* branch prediction */
+	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 82)) {
+		scb_o->fpf &= ~FPF_BPBC;
+		scb_o->fpf |= scb_s->fpf & FPF_BPBC;
+	}
+
 	/* interrupt intercept */
 	switch (scb_s->icptcode) {
 	case ICPT_PROGI:
@@ -259,6 +265,7 @@ static int shadow_scb(struct kvm_vcpu *v
 	scb_s->ecb3 = 0;
 	scb_s->ecd = 0;
 	scb_s->fac = 0;
+	scb_s->fpf = 0;
 
 	rc = prepare_cpuflags(vcpu, vsie_page);
 	if (rc)
@@ -316,6 +323,9 @@ static int shadow_scb(struct kvm_vcpu *v
 			prefix_unmapped(vsie_page);
 		scb_s->ecb |= scb_o->ecb & 0x10U;
 	}
+	/* branch prediction */
+	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 82))
+		scb_s->fpf |= scb_o->fpf & FPF_BPBC;
 	/* SIMD */
 	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 129)) {
 		scb_s->eca |= scb_o->eca & 0x00020000U;
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -870,6 +870,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info {
 #define KVM_CAP_S390_USER_INSTR0 130
 #define KVM_CAP_MSI_DEVID 131
 #define KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM 132
+#define KVM_CAP_S390_BPB 152
 
 #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING