On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:10:36AM +0530, Rajkumar Rampelli wrote: > Add support for pwm HW driver which has only capture functionality. > This helps to implement the PWM based Tachometer driver which reads > the PWM output signals from electronic fans. > > PWM Tachometer captures the period and duty cycle of the PWM signal > > Add conditional checks for callabacks enable(), disable(), config() > to check if they are supported by the client driver or not. Skip these > callbacks if they are not supported. > > Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Rampelli > --- > > V2: Added if conditional checks for pwm callbacks since drivers may > implements only pwm capture functionality. > > drivers/pwm/core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c > index 1581f6a..f70fe68 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/core.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c > @@ -246,6 +246,10 @@ static bool pwm_ops_check(const struct pwm_ops *ops) > if (ops->apply) > return true; > > + /* driver supports capture operation */ > + if (ops->capture) > + return true; > + > return false; > } > > @@ -495,7 +499,8 @@ int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state) > * ->apply(). > */ > if (pwm->state.enabled) { > - pwm->chip->ops->disable(pwm->chip, pwm); > + if (pwm->chip->ops->disable) > + pwm->chip->ops->disable(pwm->chip, pwm); This is not a good idea. It means that you'll be able to successfully configure a capture-only PWM channel for output. I think all of the output configuration functions should return an error (-ENOSYS?) for capture-only devices, much like we return -ENOSYS for pwm_capture() if the driver doesn't implement capture support. Thierry