From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751959AbeEGHjc (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2018 03:39:32 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:49817 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750990AbeEGHja (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2018 03:39:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 09:39:28 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: UV: raw_spinlock conversion Message-ID: <20180507073928.shmtfpqyhgxya53b@linutronix.de> References: <20180504111459.24825-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20180504111459.24825-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <1525604359.28142.3.camel@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1525604359.28142.3.camel@gmx.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180323 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2018-05-06 12:59:19 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sun, 2018-05-06 at 12:26 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 4 May 2018, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > > > From: Mike Galbraith > > > > > > Shrug. Lots of hobbyists have a beast in their basement, right? > > > > This hardly qualifies as a proper changelog ... > > Hm, that wasn't intended to be a changelog. > > This patch may not be current either, I haven't tested RT on a UV box > in quite some time. That last hunk looks like something that would be required even for !RT. Would you mind to check that patch and write a changelog? If it doesn't work for RT there is no need to carry this in -RT. > -Mike Sebastian