From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752298AbeEGJa0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2018 05:30:26 -0400 Received: from orcrist.hmeau.com ([104.223.48.154]:50156 "EHLO deadmen.hmeau.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752101AbeEGJaZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2018 05:30:25 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 17:30:19 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: NeilBrown Cc: Thomas Graf , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] rhashtable: further improve stability of rhashtable_walk Message-ID: <20180507093019.qkz75qm7rocnbfnl@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <152540595840.18473.11298241115621799037.stgit@noble> <152540605438.18473.4797800779538116583.stgit@noble> <20180505094212.hpqjyv5ijibviuwh@gondor.apana.org.au> <87vac1db5t.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vac1db5t.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 07:50:54AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > Do we? How could we fix it for both rhashtable and rhltable? Well I suggested earlier to insert the walker object into the hash table, which would be applicable regardless of whether it is a normal rhashtable of a rhltable. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt