From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Huaisheng HS1 Ye <yehs1@lenovo.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"vbabka@suse.cz" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"mgorman@techsingularity.net" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
"pasha.tatashin@oracle.com" <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
"alexander.levin@verizon.com" <alexander.levin@verizon.com>,
"hannes@cmpxchg.org" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp"
<penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"colyli@suse.de" <colyli@suse.de>,
NingTing Cheng <chengnt@lenovo.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 2/3] include/linux/gfp.h: use unsigned int in gfp_zone
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 11:44:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180507184410.GA12361@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HK2PR03MB1684BF10B3B515BFABD35F8B929B0@HK2PR03MB1684.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 05:16:50PM +0000, Huaisheng HS1 Ye wrote:
> I hope it couldn't cause problem, but based on my analyzation it has the potential to go wrong if users still use the flags as usual, which are __GFP_DMA, __GFP_DMA32 and __GFP_HIGHMEM.
> Let me take an example with my testing platform, these logics are much abstract, an example will be helpful.
>
> There is a two sockets X86_64 server, No HIGHMEM and it has 16 + 16GB memories.
> Its zone types shall be like this below,
>
> ZONE_DMA 0 0b0000
> ZONE_DMA32 1 0b0001
> ZONE_NORMAL 2 0b0010
> (OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM) 2 0b0010
> ZONE_MOVABLE 3 0b0011
> ZONE_DEVICE 4 0b0100 (virtual zone)
> __MAX_NR_ZONES 5
>
> __GFP_DMA = ZONE_DMA ^ ZONE_NORMAL= 0b0010
> __GFP_DMA32 = ZONE_DMA32 ^ ZONE_NORMAL= 0b0011
> __GFP_HIGHMEM = OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM ^ ZONE_NORMAL = 0b0000
> __GFP_MOVABLE = ZONE_MOVABLE ^ ZONE_NORMAL | ___GFP_MOVABLE = 0b1001
>
> Eg.
> If a driver uses flags like this below,
> Step 1:
> gfp_mask | __GFP_DMA32;
> (0b 0000 | 0b 0011 = 0b 0011)
> gfp_mask's low four bits shall equal to 0011, assuming no __GFP_MOVABLE
>
> Step 2:
> gfp_mask & ~__GFP_DMA;
> (0b 0011 & ~0b0010 = 0b0001)
> gfp_mask's low four bits shall equal to 0001 now, then when it enter gfp_zone(),
>
> return ((__force int)flags & ___GFP_ZONE_MASK) ^ ZONE_NORMAL;
> (0b0001 ^ 0b0010 = 0b0011)
> You know 0011 means that ZONE_MOVABLE will be returned.
> In this case, error can be found, because gfp_mask needs to get ZONE_DMA32 originally.
> But with existing GFP_ZONE_TABLE/BAD, it is correct. Because the bits are way of 0x1, 0x2, 0x4, 0x8
Yes, I understand your point here. My point was that this was already a bug;
the caller shouldn't simply be clearing __GFP_DMA; they really mean to clear
all of the GFP_ZONE bits so that they allocate from ZONE_NORMAL. And for
that, they should be using ~GFP_ZONEMASK
Unless they already know, of course. For example, this one in
arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c is fine:
if (strcmp(arg, "nohigh") == 0)
__userpte_alloc_gfp &= ~__GFP_HIGHMEM;
because it knows that __userpte_alloc_gfp can only have __GFP_HIGHMEM set.
But something like btrfs should almost certainly be using ~GFP_ZONEMASK.
> > +#define __GFP_HIGHMEM ((__force gfp_t)OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM ^
> > ZONE_NORMAL)
> > -#define __GFP_MOVABLE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_MOVABLE) /*
> > ZONE_MOVABLE allowed */
> > +#define __GFP_MOVABLE ((__force gfp_t)ZONE_MOVABLE ^
> > ZONE_NORMAL | \
> > + ___GFP_MOVABLE)
> >
> > Then I think you can just make it:
> >
> > static inline enum zone_type gfp_zone(gfp_t flags)
> > {
> > return ((__force int)flags & ___GFP_ZONE_MASK) ^ ZONE_NORMAL;
> > }
> Sorry, I think it has risk in this way, let me introduce a failure case for example.
>
> Now suppose that, there is a flag should represent DMA flag with movable.
> It should be like this below,
> __GFP_DMA | __GFP_MOVABLE
> (0b 0010 | 0b 1001 = 0b 1011)
> Normally, gfp_zone shall return ZONE_DMA but with MOVABLE policy, right?
No, if you somehow end up with __GFP_MOVABLE | __GFP_DMA, it should give you
ZONE_DMA.
> But with your code, gfp_zone will return ZONE_DMA32 with MOVABLE policy.
> (0b 1011 ^ 0b 0010 = 1001)
___GFP_ZONE_MASK is 0x7, so it excludes __GFP_MOVABLE.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-07 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1525416729-108201-1-git-send-email-yehs1@lenovo.com>
[not found] ` <1525416729-108201-4-git-send-email-yehs1@lenovo.com>
2018-05-04 13:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/page_alloc: Fix typo in debug info of calculate_node_totalpages Michal Hocko
2018-05-05 2:10 ` [External] " Huaisheng HS1 Ye
2018-05-09 7:48 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <1525416729-108201-3-git-send-email-yehs1@lenovo.com>
2018-05-04 13:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] include/linux/gfp.h: use unsigned int in gfp_zone Michal Hocko
2018-05-04 15:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-04 17:50 ` [External] " Huaisheng HS1 Ye
2018-05-06 9:32 ` Huaisheng HS1 Ye
2018-05-06 13:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-06 16:17 ` Huaisheng HS1 Ye
2018-05-06 18:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-07 17:16 ` Huaisheng HS1 Ye
2018-05-07 18:44 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2018-05-07 21:25 ` David Sterba
2018-05-08 0:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-09 9:36 ` David Sterba
2018-05-15 11:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-21 17:06 ` David Sterba
2018-05-09 14:57 ` Huaisheng HS1 Ye
2018-05-08 0:25 ` Huaisheng HS1 Ye
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180507184410.GA12361@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
--cc=chengnt@lenovo.com \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yehs1@lenovo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).