From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752127AbeEJTkq (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2018 15:40:46 -0400 Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:33170 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752013AbeEJTkp (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2018 15:40:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 15:40:41 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Dmitry Safonov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 0x7f454c46@gmail.com, Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] random: Omit double-printing ratelimit messages Message-ID: <20180510194041.GH8335@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Dmitry Safonov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 0x7f454c46@gmail.com, Arnd Bergmann References: <20180510125211.12583-1-dima@arista.com> <20180510125211.12583-2-dima@arista.com> <20180510181901.GG8335@thunk.org> <1525977460.28243.2.camel@arista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1525977460.28243.2.camel@arista.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 07:37:40PM +0100, Dmitry Safonov wrote: > > Ok, then what's the purpose of those messages? > : pr_notice("random: %d get_random_xx warning(s) missed " > : "due to ratelimiting\n", > : unseeded_warning.missed); > : pr_notice("random: %d urandom warning(s) missed " > : "due to ratelimiting\n", > : urandom_warning.missed); > > I thought you want to print the summary after initializing random, > not once per second? Yes, and that's what is happening today. The "output lines suppressed due to ratelimiting" message is only printed out by printk_ratelimit() function, which we are *not* using. So I'm not sure what you are unhappy about? What are you trying to fix? >>From my testing, it is *NOT* double-printing ratelimit messages today. Are you seeing something that I am not? - Ted