linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jramirez@baylibre.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] regmap: allow volatile register writes with cached only read maps
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 11:00:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180511020049.GD949@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65607fde-d0e9-0f08-3042-f6a58b760896@baylibre.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 946 bytes --]

On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 01:49:21PM +0200, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> On 05/09/2018 10:39 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I don't understand what voltile access means for write only devices.
> > Volatile means that we don't read the cache but go direct to the
> > hardware so if we can't read the hardware that's pretty redundant, a
> > volatile read that goes to the cache is just a default read.

> 1. only cached reads: (as a consequence every regmap write must succeed).
> 2. cached writes: do not access the hardware unless the value differs from
> what is in the cache already or (3) applies.
> 3. support for selectable volatile writes: those that will always access the
> device no matter what the cache holds.

We don't currently suppress writes except when regmap_update_bits()
notices that the modification was a noop.  You probably want to be using
regmap_write_bits() here instead of regmap_update_bits(), that will
always do the write.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-11  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-08 22:06 [RFC] regmap: allow volatile register writes with cached only read maps Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
2018-05-09  8:39 ` Mark Brown
2018-05-09 11:49   ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
2018-05-11  2:00     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2018-05-11 10:29       ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
2018-05-13  2:22         ` Mark Brown
2018-05-17  7:12           ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
2018-05-17 17:04             ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180511020049.GD949@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=jramirez@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).