From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751955AbeEKPkd (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2018 11:40:33 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:56566 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751839AbeEKPkN (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2018 11:40:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 17:39:47 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Alexandru Gagniuc Cc: alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com, austin_bolen@dell.com, shyam_iyer@dell.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Tony Luck , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Robert Moore , Erik Schmauss , Tyler Baicar , Will Deacon , James Morse , Shiju Jose , "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" , Dongjiu Geng , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/3] acpi: apei: Rename ghes_severity() to ghes_cper_severity() Message-ID: <20180511153947.GC12705@pd.tnic> References: <20180430212836.7807-1-mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> <20180430213358.8319-1-mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> <20180430213358.8319-2-mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180430213358.8319-2-mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 04:33:51PM -0500, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: > ghes_severity() is a misnomer in this case, as it implies the severity > of the entire GHES structure. Instead, it maps one CPER value to a > monotonically increasing number. ... as opposed to CPER severity which is something else or what is this formulation trying to express? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.