From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/ring_buffer: ensure atomicity and order of updates
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 17:24:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180514152428.GS12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180514152022.z3hnkkj3rbcabtyy@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 04:20:23PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > @@ -10499,6 +10523,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
> > goto err_cred;
> > }
> >
> > + if (in_compat_syscall())
> > + event->event_caps |= PERF_EV_CAP_COMPAT;
> > +
>
> After a native perf_event_open, you could pass the fd (or exec) to
> another task that was compat (or vice-versa), so this wouldn't work in
> that case (crazy as it may be).
>
> I don't have a better suggestion at present, though.
As discussed on IRC, we could trigger off of the buffer size; if the
buffer is <4G the &= UINT_MAX is harmless, if the buffer is larger, you
have to be using a 64bit thingy anyway.
Flipping the overflow functions around on attach/detach to buffers is a
little more dodgy, but could be done I suppose.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-14 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-10 13:06 [PATCH] perf/ring_buffer: ensure atomicity and order of updates Mark Rutland
2018-05-11 1:19 ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-11 1:19 ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-11 10:59 ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-11 16:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-14 11:05 ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-14 11:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-14 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-14 15:20 ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-14 15:24 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-05-23 16:42 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180514152428.GS12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).