linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: Fix deadlock in shutdown ioctl
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 13:27:47 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180515075747.GA6293@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de6f040b-81d3-7f52-2482-135d11200788@huawei.com>

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:39:42AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/5/10 21:20, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> > f2fs_ioc_shutdown() ioctl gets stuck in the below path
> > when going down with full sync (F2FS_GOING_DOWN_FULLSYNC)
> > option.
> > 
> > __switch_to+0x90/0xc4
> > percpu_down_write+0x8c/0xc0
> > freeze_super+0xec/0x1e4
> > freeze_bdev+0xc4/0xcc
> > f2fs_ioctl+0xc0c/0x1ce0
> > f2fs_compat_ioctl+0x98/0x1f0
> > 
> > Fix this by not holding write access during this ioctl.
> 
> I think we can just remove lock coverage for F2FS_GOING_DOWN_FULLSYNC path, for
> other path, we need to keep as it is.
>

Thanks, I thought about it too but then I checked that XFS shutdown ioctl is
not taking any lock for this ioctl. Hence, I followed the same in F2FS.
Do you know why XFS is not taking any lock? Is it really needed in shutdown
ioctl?

--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-15  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-10 13:20 [PATCH] f2fs: Fix deadlock in shutdown ioctl Sahitya Tummala
2018-05-14  3:39 ` Chao Yu
2018-05-15  7:57   ` Sahitya Tummala [this message]
2018-05-16  6:48     ` Chao Yu
2018-05-16  7:32       ` Sahitya Tummala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180515075747.GA6293@codeaurora.org \
    --to=stummala@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).