linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, bp@suse.de,
	lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, mgorman@techsingularity.net
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, juri.lelli@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 05/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: HWP boost performance on IO Wake
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 21:49:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180516044911.28797-6-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180516044911.28797-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>

When a task is woken up from IO wait, boost HWP prformance to max. This
helps IO workloads on servers with per core P-states. But changing limits
has extra over head of issuing new HWP Request MSR, which takes 1000+
cycles. So this change limits setting HWP Request MSR. Also request can
be for a remote CPU.
Rate control in setting HWP Requests:
- If the current performance is around P1, simply ignore IO flag.
- Once set wait till hold time, till remove boost. While the boost
  is on, another IO flags is notified, it will prolong boost.
- If the IO flags are notified multiple ticks apart, this may not be
IO bound task. Othewise idle system gets periodic boosts for one
IO wake.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index e200887..d418265 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <linux/tick.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/sched/cpufreq.h>
+#include <linux/sched/topology.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
@@ -224,6 +225,8 @@ struct global_params {
  * @hwp_req_cached:	Cached value of the last HWP request MSR
  * @csd:		A structure used to issue SMP async call, which
  *			defines callback and arguments
+ * @hwp_boost_active:	HWP performance is boosted on this CPU
+ * @last_io_update:	Last time when IO wake flag was set
  *
  * This structure stores per CPU instance data for all CPUs.
  */
@@ -258,6 +261,8 @@ struct cpudata {
 	s16 epp_saved;
 	u64 hwp_req_cached;
 	call_single_data_t csd;
+	bool hwp_boost_active;
+	u64 last_io_update;
 };
 
 static struct cpudata **all_cpu_data;
@@ -1421,10 +1426,80 @@ static void csd_init(struct cpudata *cpu)
 	cpu->csd.info = cpu;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Long hold time will keep high perf limits for long time,
+ * which negatively impacts perf/watt for some workloads,
+ * like specpower. 3ms is based on experiements on some
+ * workoads.
+ */
+static int hwp_boost_hold_time_ms = 3;
+
+/* Default: This will roughly around P1 on SKX */
+#define BOOST_PSTATE_THRESHOLD	(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE / 2)
+static int hwp_boost_pstate_threshold = BOOST_PSTATE_THRESHOLD;
+
+static inline bool intel_pstate_check_boost_threhold(struct cpudata *cpu)
+{
+	/*
+	 * If the last performance is above threshold, then return false,
+	 * so that caller can ignore boosting.
+	 */
+	if (arch_scale_freq_capacity(cpu->cpu) > hwp_boost_pstate_threshold)
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 static inline void intel_pstate_update_util_hwp(struct update_util_data *data,
 						u64 time, unsigned int flags)
 {
+	struct cpudata *cpu = container_of(data, struct cpudata, update_util);
+
+	if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT) {
+		/*
+		 * Set iowait_boost flag and update time. Since IO WAIT flag
+		 * is set all the time, we can't just conclude that there is
+		 * some IO bound activity is scheduled on this CPU with just
+		 * one occurrence. If we receive at least two in two
+		 * consecutive ticks, then we start treating as IO. So
+		 * there will be one tick latency.
+		 */
+		if (time_before64(time, cpu->last_io_update + 2 * TICK_NSEC) &&
+		    intel_pstate_check_boost_threhold(cpu))
+			cpu->iowait_boost = true;
+
+		cpu->last_io_update = time;
+		cpu->last_update = time;
+	}
 
+	/*
+	 * If the boost is active, we will remove it after timeout on local
+	 * CPU only.
+	 */
+	if (cpu->hwp_boost_active) {
+		if (smp_processor_id() == cpu->cpu) {
+			bool expired;
+
+			expired = time_after64(time, cpu->last_update +
+					       (hwp_boost_hold_time_ms * NSEC_PER_MSEC));
+			if (expired) {
+				intel_pstate_hwp_boost_down(cpu);
+				cpu->hwp_boost_active = false;
+				cpu->iowait_boost = false;
+			}
+		}
+		return;
+	}
+
+	cpu->last_update = time;
+
+	if (cpu->iowait_boost) {
+		cpu->hwp_boost_active = true;
+		if (smp_processor_id() == cpu->cpu)
+			intel_pstate_hwp_boost_up(cpu);
+		else
+			smp_call_function_single_async(cpu->cpu, &cpu->csd);
+	}
 }
 
 static inline void intel_pstate_calc_avg_perf(struct cpudata *cpu)
-- 
2.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-16  4:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-16  4:49 [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 00/10] Intel_pstate: HWP Dynamic performance boost Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 01/10] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  9:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 02/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Conditional frequency invariant accounting Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  7:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  7:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  9:07       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-16 17:32         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 15:19   ` Juri Lelli
2018-05-16 15:47     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 16:31       ` Juri Lelli
2018-05-17 10:59         ` Juri Lelli
2018-05-17 15:04           ` Juri Lelli
2018-05-17 15:41             ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-17 16:16               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-17 16:42                 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-17 16:56                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-17 18:28                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-18  7:36                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-18 10:57                       ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-18 11:29                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-18 13:33                           ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-30 16:57                             ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-18 14:09                           ` Valentin Schneider
2018-05-16 15:58     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Utility functions to boost HWP performance limits Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  7:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  9:15     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-16 10:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 15:39         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 15:41     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 04/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add update_util_hook for HWP Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  4:49 ` Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2018-05-16  7:37   ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 05/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: HWP boost performance on IO Wake Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 17:55     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-17  8:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  9:45   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-16 19:28     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 06/10] cpufreq / sched: Add interface to get utilization values Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  6:40   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-05-16 22:25     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  8:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 22:40     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-17  7:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 07/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: HWP boost performance on busy task migrate Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  9:49   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-16 20:59     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 08/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Dyanmically update busy pct Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  7:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  7:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 09/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: New sysfs entry to control HWP boost Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  4:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: enable boost for SKX Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  7:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 15:46     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16 15:54       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-17  0:52         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-05-16  6:49 ` [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 00/10] Intel_pstate: HWP Dynamic performance boost Juri Lelli
2018-05-16 15:43   ` Srinivas Pandruvada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180516044911.28797-6-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).