From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752730AbeEUKzR (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2018 06:55:17 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:46970 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751078AbeEUKzQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2018 06:55:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 11:55:11 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , jnair@caviumnetworks.com, Robert Richter , Vadim.Lomovtsev@cavium.com, Jan.Glauber@cavium.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ThunderX2: Add Cavium ThunderX2 SoC UNCORE PMU driver Message-ID: <20180521105511.6ztjk5conf7lfaiz@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20180425090047.6485-1-ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com> <20180425090047.6485-3-ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com> <20180426105938.y6unpt36lisb7kbr@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 12:16:13AM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:30:47PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > >> + * > >> + * L3 Tile and DMC channel selection is through SMC call > >> + * SMC call arguments, > >> + * x0 = THUNDERX2_SMC_CALL_ID (Vendor SMC call Id) > >> + * x1 = THUNDERX2_SMC_SET_CHANNEL (Id to set DMC/L3C channel) > >> + * x2 = Node id > > > > How do we map Linux node IDs to the firmware's view of node IDs? > > > > I don't believe the two are necessarily the same -- Linux's node IDs are > > a Linux-specific construct. > > both are same, it is numa node id from ACPI/firmware. I am very wary about assuming that the Linux nid will always be the same as the ACPI node id. For that to *potentially* be true, this driver should depend on CONFIG_NUMA, NUMA must not be disabled on the command line, etc, or the node id will always be NUMA_NO_NODE. I would be *much* happier if we had an explicit mapping somewhere to the ID the FW expects. > > It would be much nicer if we could pass something based on the MPIDR, > > which is a known HW construct, or if this implicitly affected the > > current node. > > IMO, node id is sufficient. I agree that *a* node ID is sufficient, I just don't think that we're guaranteed to have the specific node ID the FW wants. > > It would be vastly more sane for this to not be muxed at all. :/ > > i am helpless due to crappy hw design! I'm certainly not blaming you for this! :) I hope the HW designers don't make the same mistake in future, though... Thanks, Mark.