From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933208AbeEWN4Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2018 09:56:25 -0400 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:42342 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932900AbeEWN4U (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2018 09:56:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 14:56:09 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Guenter Roeck , Liam Girdwood , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Guenter Roeck , Chintan Patel , Jaroslav Kysela , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] ASoC: topology: Improve backwards compatibility with v4 topology files Message-ID: <20180523135609.GK4828@sirena.org.uk> References: <20180522165842.233949-1-groeck@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJAclU0AInkryoed" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Excellent day to have a rotten day. User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --IJAclU0AInkryoed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 03:54:54PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > And I'm wondering whether we should move these definitions to uapi > headers. Yes, we should. --IJAclU0AInkryoed Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlsFcvgACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DoKAf/USPmjJ56h/dkk2Lo8ldpcGetP2ZQMIa3AcdlOdduDJK/gi4NSf+cF5eo n0H1IdBK9pwF2PVjCtGnXm+DivEvhD4IH6nKG0e94OKSAvP+S2vqT3LJSIX5+h59 G7D17OtHQABd4VOMCGIGMx1PZRvKO9Kui3YUWr+uCMUreNlAvJ+W+bnmO10l3oWm NoPQDAWPkpDinukGVO3fZueTF/QI2o4lowMf0UgPdshsXNDv3xk4VpH7l+nMG4H3 pWRQF8nnqVz++h0Ckwns7Zs2mct8w9CICK6Fu4APfU4uhCCPBEzQACE1+39na6+e lJd6E5HsJhDqOt2sGKQy4UrsTZ4J1w== =dMFf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJAclU0AInkryoed--