From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751886AbeFDKdC (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2018 06:33:02 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:41362 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750868AbeFDKdB (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2018 06:33:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:33:32 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Chintan Pandya Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, toshi.kani@hpe.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/5] Fix issues with huge mapping in ioremap for ARM64 Message-ID: <20180604103332.GF9482@arm.com> References: <1527856758-27169-1-git-send-email-cpandya@codeaurora.org> <1a648674-da56-6664-bf3c-0cdf825ad1e3@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1a648674-da56-6664-bf3c-0cdf825ad1e3@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Chintan, On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 11:26:28AM +0530, Chintan Pandya wrote: > Just curious to know, is there anything that I should be addressing > in these patches ? For now, I don't see anything from my side that > requires modification, unless one has some more review comments on > this. > > Status so far on and around this: > - Status of Toshi's series of patches is still not clear to me. > However, if this series can get through first, there won't > be conflicting scenarios as far as arm64 is concerned. > - I've rebased these patches on tip > - Also re-tested these patches for long duration tests with > 1 GB mapping case also exercised enough. Test ended positively. I'll try to review this version today. Will