From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751941AbeFEQEK (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:04:10 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35154 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751748AbeFEQEI (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:04:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 13:04:04 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Adrian Hunter , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Alexander Shishkin , Dave Hansen , Joerg Roedel , Jiri Olsa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 00/17] perf tools and x86 PTI entry trampolines Message-ID: <20180605160404.GL4899@kernel.org> References: <1526986485-6562-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <4017be61-554f-f356-b68d-64981261f8dd@intel.com> <20180605152943.GH4899@kernel.org> <20180605160046.GZ12180@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180605160046.GZ12180@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 06:00:46PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 12:29:43PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Arnaldo has queued the tools patches, but there are still 3 kernel patches: > > > > > > kallsyms: Simplify update_iter_mod() > > > kallsyms, x86: Export addresses of syscall trampolines > > That one needs a changelog. > > > > x86: Add entry trampolines to kcore > > > > > > Are there any further comments on these? Can they be applied? > > > > Would be interesting to have some acked-by from kernel folks :-\ > > Other than that, they look good I tihnk. The updatE_iter_mod thing took > me a few tries, so maybe something can be done to the changelog there > too, maybe explicitly mention the rule for the *mod_end things. I was feeling daft, good to see you found that difficult to follow 8-) - Arnaldo