From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org by pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org (Dovecot) with LMTP id YknpIkiPGltJSwAAmS7hNA ; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 14:14:32 +0000 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 73F046089E; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 14:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.codeaurora.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=roeck-us.net header.i=@roeck-us.net header.b="UhXQU3Bt" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACD960290; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 14:14:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org EACD960290 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=roeck-us.net Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752357AbeFHOO3 (ORCPT + 25 others); Fri, 8 Jun 2018 10:14:29 -0400 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:51872 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751265AbeFHOO2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2018 10:14:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=roeck-us.net; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References :Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dfMILGaiyAa6xsz/32/PkuS67Xcrrr7kzziAQp4wrk0=; b=UhXQU3BtAcwmfP0bY9KXJZrZrq O4GyQa7N3HEUs/AXTToV4kBWhmJ8QdU1GKKaTdhqGmSbLhKhlhTI1WE7CbVz3r25I7oq6YQGiUjbk 65FzyBONGqSsury7cXJJogY2SgudVJwqXmA+R8R/cQjyVYlDdFuQTlUhM7jRyQYGtThA9AcKFS2fW t8XoCuVyLHnROgfhuz774LmTMA72jWhmfg3RnHnhd/+s2XgbSjWWPuIoj4JmLjSLWEa4AGwyKr6sr eMhQ+U7LX0cWfyHgCs5fes8Nyf4SPSsBm6eotfFlq9KtT6MGd76RZulf3lYFBQw8vEQ2H80AmuQFm 2K+nDM2A==; Received: from 108-223-40-66.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net ([108.223.40.66]:46504 helo=localhost) by bh-25.webhostbox.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fRI9r-0046kh-K9; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 14:14:28 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 07:14:26 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Ben Hutchings Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/410] 3.16.57-rc1 review Message-ID: <20180608141426.GA5242@roeck-us.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Authenticated_sender: guenter@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: guenter@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: guenter@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 03:05:20PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.57 release. > There are 410 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu Jun 14 18:00:00 UTC 2018. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 138 pass: 136 fail: 2 Failed builds: i386:tools/perf x86_64:tools/perf Qemu test results: total: 116 pass: 116 fail: 0 tools/perf builds are new, so it is probably not entirely surprising that they fail. Deetails are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders/. Guenter