From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8C4C5CFC0 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 02:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB52208B8 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 02:37:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="OnQqRs7F" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EFB52208B8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965456AbeFOChf (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2018 22:37:35 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:43564 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965015AbeFOChd (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2018 22:37:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BTpA1wMErZIXaW7KuJxgSpRZchpEnWiyH/BfQHvddd0=; b=OnQqRs7FgPQhULV8UGKEC/Dum N77uoyczvXtckzy9oqerUmE5uaedW/y9fuImSHGYzUC3jP8u1J1Mt0aSnRe6yn9rxulnQJZgY2zbA TXrBjlWLJ8Ws/aDRPl6LZhEAc7xhetGRaRxtQHH/8sk0IexNAJ8Oelqf8+rGphReD48cjRib6KD4n 21bupz9nbSM3loBqpZEDW1v4mug4b/Jrt1F1CDNkzF8XIdbGKW7/mQr2k3pcFFJ5eFeyC348K6gAZ vwBKa3VAEeEFidimeQM+HD8I9X5fqN+OwKM4CjYQ2DXfLcWYIy/gw+v196njk7WE9gyQqNHdwJLML 87lTrWdNg==; Received: from willy by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fTecF-0003Nl-En; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 02:37:31 +0000 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 19:37:31 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Juergen Gross , qla2xxx-upstream@qlogic.com, Kent Overstreet , Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use sbitmap instead of percpu_ida Message-ID: <20180615023731.GA5706@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20180612190545.10781-1-willy@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:06:58PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Matthew, > > > Removing the percpu_ida code nets over 400 lines of removal. It's not > > as spectacular as deleting an entire architecture, but it's still a > > worthy reduction in lines of code. > > Since most of the changes are in scsi or target, should I take this > series through my tree? I'd welcome that. Nick seems to be inactive as target maintainer; his tree on kernel.org hasn't seen any updates in five months. Thanks!