From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] PM / devfreq: Init user limits from OPP limits, not viceversa
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 14:25:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180615212542.GP88063@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180615210619.GA249892@rodete-desktop-imager.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 02:06:21PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:47:01PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > Commit ab8f58ad72c4 ("PM / devfreq: Set min/max_freq when adding
> > the devfreq device") introduced the initialization of the user
> > limits min/max_freq from the lowest/highest available OPPs. Later
> > commit f1d981eaecf8 ("PM / devfreq: Use the available min/max
> > frequency") added scaling_min/max_freq, which actually represent
> > the frequencies of the lowest/highest available OPP. scaling_min/
> > max_freq are initialized with the values from min/max_freq, which
> > is totally correct in the context, but a bit awkward to read.
> >
> > Swap the initialization and assign scaling_min/max_freq with the
> > OPP freqs and then the user limts min/max_freq with scaling_min/
> > max_freq.
> >
> > Needless to say that this change is a NOP, intended to improve
> > readability.
> > ---
>
> BTW, putting the '---' here means that stuff below it usually gets
> dropped when applied (e.g., with git-am). So it'll drop your
> Signed-off-by and Reviewed-by. Not a huge problem if the maintainers
> look out for that.
It wasn't intended and is related with my current workflow: To keep
easily track of deltas in my tree and have the changelog ready when
sending the patches I currently keep the changelog in the commit
message and manually move it below '---' when doing 'git send-email'.
Seems I got it wrong in this case :(
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-15 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-14 19:47 [PATCH v3 00/12] Add throttler driver for non-thermal throttling Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-06-14 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] PM / devfreq: Init user limits from OPP limits, not viceversa Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-06-15 21:06 ` Brian Norris
2018-06-15 21:25 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2018-06-14 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] PM / devfreq: Fix handling of min/max_freq == 0 Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-06-18 20:12 ` Brian Norris
2018-06-14 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] PM / devfreq: Don't adjust to user limits in governors Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-06-14 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] PM / devfreq: Add struct devfreq_policy Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-06-14 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] PM / devfreg: Add support for policy notifiers Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-06-14 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] PM / devfreq: Make update_devfreq() public Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-06-14 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] PM / devfreq: export devfreq_class Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-06-14 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] cpufreq: Add stub for cpufreq_update_policy() Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-06-14 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] dt-bindings: PM / OPP: add opp-throttlers property Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-06-14 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] misc: throttler: Add core support for non-thermal throttling Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-06-18 23:03 ` Brian Norris
2018-06-18 23:59 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-06-14 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] misc: throttler: Add Chrome OS EC throttler Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-06-18 23:34 ` Brian Norris
2018-06-14 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] mfd: cros_ec: Add throttler sub-device Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-06-18 23:21 ` Brian Norris
2018-06-19 8:41 ` Enric Balletbo Serra
2018-06-19 17:55 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-06-19 17:43 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180615212542.GP88063@google.com \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).