From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com, steven.sistare@oracle.com,
dhaval.giani@oracle.com, rohit.k.jain@oracle.com,
umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com, riel@surriel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/11] select_idle_sibling rework
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:06:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180619220639.GA14960@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180530142236.667774973@infradead.org>
On Wed, 30 May, at 04:22:36PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is all still very preliminary and could all still go up in flames (it has
> only seen hackbench so far). This is mostly the same code I posted yesterday,
> but hopefully in a more readable form.
>
> This fixes the SIS_PROP as per the outline here:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180425153600.GA4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
>
> and Rohit's suggestion of folding the iteration loops.
>
> For testing I would suggest to ignore the last 3 patches, those are purely
> cleanups once the first lot is found to actually work as advertised.
This series looks pretty good from my testing. I see double-digit
improvements to hackbench results and only one case of a clear
regression (easily offset by all the wins).
Are you aware of any regressions for particular benchmarks I should
take a look at?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-19 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-30 14:22 [RFC 00/11] select_idle_sibling rework Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 01/11] sched/fair: Fix select_idle_cpu()s cost accounting Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 02/11] sched/fair: Age the average idle time Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 03/11] sched/fair: Only use time once Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 04/11] sched/topology: Introduce sched_domain_cores() Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 05/11] sched/fair: Re-arrange select_idle_cpu() Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 06/11] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 07/11] sched/fair: Fold the select_idle_sibling() scans Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 08/11] sched/fair: Optimize SIS_FOLD Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 09/11] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_PROP Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 10/11] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AGE/SIS_ONCE Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 14:22 ` [RFC 11/11] sched/fair: Remove SIS_FOLD Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-19 22:06 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2018-06-20 22:20 ` [RFC 00/11] select_idle_sibling rework Steven Sistare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180619220639.GA14960@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=dhaval.giani@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rohit.k.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
--cc=subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).