On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:28:03AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:

> OK, great.  I guess I'm confused about the "|| COMPILE_TEST" causing
> problems then?  I was worried that anyone trying to do "COMPILE_TEST"
> on your tree (or linuxnext if RPMh isn't there) would get failures due
> to the lack of header files.  I guess if it's a problem you could just
> gut the "|| COMPILE_TEST" and it could be added back in later?

Ugh, yes - that'll break things.  In that case I can't apply this
without a signed tag from Andy's tree with the dependency stuff in.