From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,FSL_HELO_FAKE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81147C6778C for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 07:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311DD24DE5 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 07:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="gcxLgCB4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 311DD24DE5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933442AbeGCH4q (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2018 03:56:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:55259 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753364AbeGCH4o (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2018 03:56:44 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id i139-v6so1215461wmf.4 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:56:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=eXn9TX9uOUDrWIGJ59oHkaLXdAoTDmYnAJV1Hw2cOaY=; b=gcxLgCB4uHbsmUBKd2onJjBkmTOqg6pg2/WARxpItsYTq6FQID63W5A3bkJLLXHDXu 697MjVDXs4TYT8wXfobszsr8jPF2p1TqXh6j1AlewJSLOaXoXzyMP9Im7TrN4OvXUH5F zxaDBqd6GyXX1NUbw3yBl+RvSn4+AgTntWMZnE1xZfqttrLX6fS2csuGr8wwotJA9o4D 6UeJme70huodXOcUijnKQwVj0HFi+l0meS7x2JflMG8NsH95yuPNk5NnF3O8weHeyiHw Grq8WZnhU9xL1rS+g8sJLKm5Fdtmb0CjAAvH3GCnf3gDZqSd8wRlh9kB2ani9Oy+5Teq ndLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=eXn9TX9uOUDrWIGJ59oHkaLXdAoTDmYnAJV1Hw2cOaY=; b=GCuf8kWIfMxPUQI62L3LAVtUIRQFyAh3EY2K98izI+VtfvVArlS4xTJYLv+P6s3gh1 BzFiiDpNVcUA7aDYU4xq7u+JCAxWEckRKmf3bogk/ttMfEQta+1uAW7C7ihdNUP0txT/ g8qRKIauy0ptTH5Rzed3YUyVHL1+nR8NCyQ/XtVUDrIbqwWfdSHBpINwJjaxE+EB82gU 9f/jMEe5wCMh072DxAxSkiRrLKDbQLGvFhQ3+PVeozKZMK7bHaqa/1L8y6D2qssTjWHR XEqXOfJVmpexY4kVbSlg6a3b/YqazKBaCFF7eWBD9QxRlCgYEPdnHz/8XAJI3IU+D8l2 xmKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2vW5RrDpDD/9djimHS9HkaF02HLeYZ5utTvIIalQrF2E9vVCXL i7fvMdjGRX1pSznDGFIaYidQCg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeatZOLGHKH/WuFqVqGdPXYo5/ZxPHbjMYZccvgXnO2TtLhZlHWD4HNI4Eq237Fw78NGqL8TQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9754:: with SMTP id z81-v6mr386833wmd.35.1530604603608; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (2E8B0CD5.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [46.139.12.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 24-v6sm1718588wrz.94.2018.07.03.00.56.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:56:40 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes Message-ID: <20180703075640.GA14419@gmail.com> References: <20180630084933.GA15210@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 11:48 AM Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > > BTR is way more leet than AND! > > I stand corrected. Ok, on that basis I won't try to convert it to AND ;-) Seriously though, there's two other 32-bit prefix cleanup/micro-speedup changes I'll queue up later today: [PATCH v2] x86-64: use 32-bit XOR to zero registers [PATCH] x86/entry/64: add two more instruction suffixes I'll Cc: you guys on the commits and maybe you can find something weird (or leet) in them as well. Thanks, Ingo