linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
To: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	valentin.schneider@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, gaku.inami.xh@renesas.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 11/12] sched/core: Disable SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY for root_domains without asymmetry
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 14:31:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180705133142.GD32579@e108498-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1530699470-29808-12-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com>

Hi Morten,

On Wednesday 04 Jul 2018 at 11:17:49 (+0100), Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index 71330e0e41db..29c186961345 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -1160,6 +1160,26 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
>  	sd_id = cpumask_first(sched_domain_span(sd));
>  
>  	/*
> +	 * Check if cpu_map eclipses cpu capacity asymmetry.
> +	 */
> +
> +	if (sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY) {
> +		int i;
> +		bool disable = true;
> +		long capacity = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, sd_id);
> +
> +		for_each_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
> +			if (capacity != arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, i)) {
> +				disable = false;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		if (disable)
> +			sd->flags &= ~SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
>  	 * Convert topological properties into behaviour.
>  	 */

If SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY means that some CPUs have different
arch_scale_cpu_capacity() values, we could also automatically _set_
the flag in sd_init() no ? Why should we let the arch set it and just
correct it later ?

I understand the moment at which we know the capacities of CPUs varies
from arch to arch, but the arch code could just call
rebuild_sched_domain when the capacities of CPUs change and let the
scheduler detect things automatically. I mean, even if the arch code
sets the flag in its topology level table, it will have to rebuild
the sched domains anyway ...

What do you think ?

Thanks,
Quentin

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-05 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-04 10:17 [PATCHv4 00/12] sched/fair: Migrate 'misfit' tasks on asymmetric capacity systems Morten Rasmussen
2018-07-04 10:17 ` [PATCHv4 01/12] sched: Add static_key for asymmetric cpu capacity optimizations Morten Rasmussen
2018-07-31 10:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-02 15:15     ` Morten Rasmussen
2018-09-10 10:13   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/topology: Add static_key for asymmetric CPU " tip-bot for Morten Rasmussen
2018-07-04 10:17 ` [PATCHv4 02/12] sched/fair: Add group_misfit_task load-balance type Morten Rasmussen
2018-09-10 10:13   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Add 'group_misfit_task' " tip-bot for Morten Rasmussen
2018-07-04 10:17 ` [PATCHv4 03/12] sched: Add sched_group per-cpu max capacity Morten Rasmussen
2018-09-10 10:14   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Add sched_group per-CPU " tip-bot for Morten Rasmussen
2018-07-04 10:17 ` [PATCHv4 04/12] sched/fair: Consider misfit tasks when load-balancing Morten Rasmussen
2018-09-10 10:14   ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Morten Rasmussen
2018-07-04 10:17 ` [PATCHv4 05/12] sched/fair: Kick nohz balance if rq->misfit_task_load Morten Rasmussen
2018-09-10 10:15   ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Valentin Schneider
2018-07-04 10:17 ` [PATCHv4 06/12] sched/fair: Change prefer_sibling type to bool Morten Rasmussen
2018-09-10 10:15   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Change 'prefer_sibling' " tip-bot for Valentin Schneider
2018-07-04 10:17 ` [PATCHv4 07/12] sched: Change root_domain->overload type to int Morten Rasmussen
2018-09-10 10:16   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/core: " tip-bot for Valentin Schneider
2018-07-04 10:17 ` [PATCHv4 08/12] sched: Wrap rq->rd->overload accesses with READ/WRITE_ONCE Morten Rasmussen
2018-09-10 10:17   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Wrap rq->rd->overload accesses with READ/WRITE_ONCE() tip-bot for Valentin Schneider
2018-07-04 10:17 ` [PATCHv4 09/12] sched/fair: Set rq->rd->overload when misfit Morten Rasmussen
2018-09-10 10:17   ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Valentin Schneider
2018-07-04 10:17 ` [PATCHv4 10/12] sched/fair: Don't move tasks to lower capacity cpus unless necessary Morten Rasmussen
2018-09-10 10:18   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Don't move tasks to lower capacity CPUs " tip-bot for Chris Redpath
2018-07-04 10:17 ` [PATCHv4 11/12] sched/core: Disable SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY for root_domains without asymmetry Morten Rasmussen
2018-07-05 13:31   ` Quentin Perret [this message]
2018-07-05 14:13     ` Morten Rasmussen
2018-07-05 15:03       ` Quentin Perret
2018-07-20 13:54         ` Morten Rasmussen
2018-07-04 10:17 ` [PATCHv4 12/12] sched/core: Disable SD_PREFER_SIBLING on asymmetric cpu capacity domains Morten Rasmussen
2018-07-06 10:18   ` Vincent Guittot
2018-07-06 14:31     ` Morten Rasmussen
2018-07-31 12:17       ` Vincent Guittot
2018-07-31 12:33         ` Valentin Schneider
2018-08-06 10:20           ` Vincent Guittot
2018-08-06 10:53             ` Valentin Schneider
2018-08-10  9:30               ` Vincent Guittot
2018-09-10 10:18   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/core: Disable SD_PREFER_SIBLING on asymmetric CPU " tip-bot for Morten Rasmussen
2018-07-06 10:18 ` [PATCHv4 00/12] sched/fair: Migrate 'misfit' tasks on asymmetric capacity systems Vincent Guittot
2018-07-09 15:08   ` Morten Rasmussen
2018-07-26 17:14     ` Valentin Schneider
2018-07-30 14:30       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2018-07-31 12:13         ` Vincent Guittot
2018-07-31 12:14           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2018-07-31 12:11     ` Vincent Guittot
2018-07-31 12:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-31 12:10   ` Valentin Schneider
2018-07-31 12:50     ` Morten Rasmussen
2018-08-17  1:57 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-08-20  2:50 ` Gaku Inami

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180705133142.GD32579@e108498-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=quentin.perret@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gaku.inami.xh@renesas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).