From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139E2C3279B for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 16:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B495A223EE for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 16:41:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B495A223EE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933822AbeGFQlb (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 12:41:31 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:39968 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933402AbeGFQla (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 12:41:30 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F5118A; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:41:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from edgewater-inn.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D9D933F2EA; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:41:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by edgewater-inn.cambridge.arm.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 736731AE3105; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:42:10 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:42:10 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Mark Rutland Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.martin@arm.com, hch@infradead.org, james.morse@arm.com, linux@dominikbrodowski.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 00/19] arm64: invoke syscalls with pt_regs Message-ID: <20180706164210.GC27483@arm.com> References: <20180702110415.10465-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180702110415.10465-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 12:03:56PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > This series reworks arm64's syscall handling to minimize the propagation > of user-controlled register values into speculated code paths. As with > x86 [1], a wrapper is generated for each syscall, which extracts the > argument from a struct pt_regs. During kernel entry from userspace, > registers are zeroed. > > The arm64 kernel code directly invokes some syscalls which the x86 code > doesn't, so I've added ksys_* wrappers for these, following the x86 > example. The rest of the series is arm64-specific. > > I've pushed the series out to my arm64/syscall-regs branch [2] on > kernel.org. Modulo the macro label nit in the ssbd code, this series looks fine to me. Catalin -- have you thrown this at LTP? Will