From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
1vier1@web.de, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12 V2] ipc: cleanups & bugfixes, rhashtable update
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:10:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180710221003.aybnnha2hhcl4gd7@linux-r8p5> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be986d6d-4388-5d4e-e1cb-5ae28212d120@colorfullife.com>
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, Manfred Spraul wrote:
>Which patch do you prefer?
>I have seen two versions, and if I have picked up the wrong one, then
>I can change it.
Nah, you picked up the right one.
I was only pointing out at the alternative patch so that it didn't come
out of nowhere for the rhashtable folks.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-10 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-09 15:10 [PATCH 0/12 V2] ipc: cleanups & bugfixes, rhashtable update Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 01/12] ipc: reorganize initialization of kern_ipc_perm.id Manfred Spraul
2018-07-10 22:08 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 02/12] ipc: reorganize initialization of kern_ipc_perm.seq Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 03/12] ipc/util.c: Use ipc_rcu_putref() for failues in ipc_addid() Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 04/12] ipc: Rename ipcctl_pre_down_nolock() Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 19:49 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 05/12] ipc/util.c: correct comment in ipc_obtain_object_check Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 18:46 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 06/12] ipc: rename ipc_lock() to ipc_lock_idr() Manfred Spraul
2018-07-11 19:38 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 07/12] ipc_idr_alloc refactoring Manfred Spraul
2018-07-11 19:52 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-07-11 20:00 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 08/12] lib/rhashtable: simplify bucket_table_alloc() Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 09/12] lib/rhashtable: guarantee initial hashtable allocation Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 10/12] ipc: get rid of ids->tables_initialized hack Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 11/12] ipc: simplify ipc initialization Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 21:42 ` Andrew Morton
2018-07-09 23:55 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 12/12] ipc/util.c: Further ipc_idr_alloc cleanups Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 17:05 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-07-09 18:22 ` Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 18:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-07-09 20:09 ` [PATCH 0/12 V2] ipc: cleanups & bugfixes, rhashtable update Davidlohr Bueso
2018-07-10 4:44 ` Manfred Spraul
2018-07-10 22:10 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180710221003.aybnnha2hhcl4gd7@linux-r8p5 \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=1vier1@web.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).