linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: subhashj@codeaurora.org, cang@codeaurora.org,
	vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org,
	vinholikatti@gmail.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@codeaurora.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/9] scsi: ufs: add option to change default UFS power management level
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:33:17 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180711203317.GA14983@rob-hp-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff2b648007a400c60ba804a0c5cab0166bd268e7.1530880006.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org>

On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 06:00:31PM +0530, Asutosh Das wrote:
> From: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
> 
> UFS device and link can be put in multiple different low power modes hence
> UFS driver supports multiple different low power modes. By default UFS
> driver selects the default (optimal) low power mode (which gives moderate
> power savings and have relatively less enter and exit latencies) but
> we might have to tune this default power mode for different chipset
> platforms to meet the low power requirements/goals. Hence this patch
> adds option to change default UFS low power mode (level).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt      | 11 ++++++++
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.c                   | 14 +++++++++++
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c                          | 29 +++++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h                          |  4 +--
>  4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
> index c39dfef..f564d9a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
> @@ -38,6 +38,15 @@ Optional properties:
>  			  defined or a value in the array is "0" then it is assumed
>  			  that the frequency is set by the parent clock or a
>  			  fixed rate clock source.
> +- rpm-level		: UFS Runtime power management level. Following PM levels are supported:
> +			  0 - Both UFS device and Link in active state (Highest power consumption)
> +			  1 - UFS device in active state but Link in Hibern8 state
> +			  2 - UFS device in Sleep state but Link in active state
> +			  3 - UFS device in Sleep state and Link in hibern8 state (default PM level)
> +			  4 - UFS device in Power-down state and Link in Hibern8 state
> +			  5 - UFS device in Power-down state and Link in OFF state (Lowest power consumption)
> +- spm-level		: UFS System power management level. Allowed PM levels are same as rpm-level.

What's the default?

I assume these are minimums? The OS can pick higher power states. This 
seems to be a bit Linux specific (as 'runtime PM' could be considered 
Linux specific). For every other device, we don't put this type of 
information in DT, but is user controlled. So really, wouldn't 1 
property be sufficient for cases where a mode doesn't work due to 
some h/w limitation. Otherwise, it is an OS or user decision.

> +
>  -lanes-per-direction	: number of lanes available per direction - either 1 or 2.
>  			  Note that it is assume same number of lanes is used both
>  			  directions at once. If not specified, default is 2 lanes per direction.
> @@ -66,4 +75,6 @@ Example:
>  		freq-table-hz = <100000000 200000000>, <0 0>, <0 0>;
>  		phys = <&ufsphy1>;
>  		phy-names = "ufsphy";
> +		rpm-level = <3>;

Why specified if 3 is the default?

> +		spm-level = <5>;

These seem like sane defaults. When and why would you use some 
different?

Rob

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-11 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1530880006.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
2018-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] scsi: ufs: add support to allow non standard behaviours (quirks) Asutosh Das
2018-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] scsi: Allow auto suspend override by low-level driver Asutosh Das
2018-07-11 10:45   ` Adrian Hunter
2018-07-20 23:50   ` Subhash Jadavani
2018-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] scsi: ufs: Override auto suspend tunables for ufs Asutosh Das
2018-07-11 10:46   ` Adrian Hunter
2018-07-20 23:51   ` Subhash Jadavani
2018-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] scsi: ufs: add option to change default UFS power management level Asutosh Das
2018-07-11 10:50   ` Adrian Hunter
2018-07-23  3:09     ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2018-07-11 20:33   ` Rob Herring [this message]
2018-07-23  3:20     ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2018-07-23 14:36       ` Rob Herring
2018-07-24  3:34         ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2018-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] scsi: ufs: add support for hibern8 on idle Asutosh Das
2018-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v1 6/9] scsi: ufs: optimize clock, pm_qos, hibern8 handling in queuecommand Asutosh Das
2018-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v1 7/9] scsi: ufs: add UFS power collapse support during hibern8 Asutosh Das
2018-07-20 23:58   ` Subhash Jadavani
2018-07-23  3:07     ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2018-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v1 8/9] scsi: ufs: enable runtime pm only after ufshcd init Asutosh Das
2018-07-21  0:05   ` Subhash Jadavani
2018-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v1 9/9] scsi: ufs: enable FASTAUTO mode during low load condition Asutosh Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180711203317.GA14983@rob-hp-laptop \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=malat@debian.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=venkatg@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=vinholikatti@gmail.com \
    --cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).