linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: arnd@arndb.de
Cc: jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, john.hurley@netronome.com,
	simon.horman@netronome.com, pieter.jansenvanvuuren@netronome.com,
	jiri@mellanox.com, oss-drivers@netronome.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RESEND] nfp: avoid using getnstimeofday64()
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:56:10 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180712.145610.148554127408069933.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180711123003.453442-2-arnd@arndb.de>

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:29:53 +0200

> getnstimeofday64 is deprecated in favor of the ktime_get() family of
> functions. The direct replacement would be ktime_get_real_ts64(),
> but I'm picking the basic ktime_get() instead:
> 
> - using a ktime_t simplifies the code compared to timespec64
> - using monotonic time instead of real time avoids issues caused
>   by a concurrent settimeofday() or during a leap second adjustment.
> 
> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Applied to net-next.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-12 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-11 12:29 [PATCH 1/2] [RESEND] liquidio: use ktime_get_real_ts64() instead of getnstimeofday64() Arnd Bergmann
2018-07-11 12:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] [RESEND] nfp: avoid using getnstimeofday64() Arnd Bergmann
2018-07-12 21:56   ` David Miller [this message]
2018-07-12 21:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] [RESEND] liquidio: use ktime_get_real_ts64() instead of getnstimeofday64() Felix Manlunas
2018-07-12 21:56 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180712.145610.148554127408069933.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
    --cc=john.hurley@netronome.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
    --cc=pieter.jansenvanvuuren@netronome.com \
    --cc=simon.horman@netronome.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).