linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, "Stephen Bates" <sbates@raithlin.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	"Kai-Heng Feng" <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
	"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] PCI: Introduce the disable_acs_redir parameter
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 11:15:43 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180716111543.6ddf584c@t450s.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180713233158.19528-5-logang@deltatee.com>

On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:31:58 -0600
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> wrote:

> In order to support P2P traffic on a segment of the PCI hierarchy,
> we must be able to disable the ACS redirect bits for select
> PCI bridges. The bridges must be selected before the devices are
> discovered by the kernel and the IOMMU groups created. Therefore,
> a kernel command line parameter is created to specify devices
> which must have their ACS bits disabled.
> 
> The new parameter takes a list of devices separated by a semicolon.
> Each device specified will have it's ACS redirect bits disabled.
> This is similar to the existing 'resource_alignment' parameter.
> 
> The ACS Request P2P Request Redirect, P2P Completion Redirect and P2P
> Egress Control bits are disabled which is sufficient to always allow
> passing P2P traffic uninterrupted. The bits are set after the kernel
> (optionally) enables the ACS bits itself. It is also done regardless of
> whether the kernel sets the bits or not seeing some BIOS firmware is known
> to set the bits on boot.
> 
> If the user tries to disable the ACS redirct for a device without the
> ACS capability, a warning is printed to dmesg.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>
> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |  9 +++
>  drivers/pci/pci.c                               | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index a69947d9e14e..02634c4ab181 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -3192,6 +3192,15 @@
>  				Adding the window is slightly risky (it may
>  				conflict with unreported devices), so this
>  				taints the kernel.
> +		disable_acs_redir=<pci_dev>[; ...]
> +				Specify one or more PCI devices (in the format
> +				specified above) separated by semicolons.
> +				Each device specified will have the PCI ACS
> +				redirect capabilities forced off which will
> +				allow P2P traffic between devices through
> +				bridges without forcing it upstream. Note:
> +				this removes isolation between devices and
> +				will make the IOMMU groups less granular.
>  
>  	pcie_aspm=	[PCIE] Forcibly enable or disable PCIe Active State Power
>  			Management.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 59638075b4df..195b93824e6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -2983,6 +2983,66 @@ void pci_request_acs(void)
>  	pci_acs_enable = 1;
>  }
>  
> +static const char *disable_acs_redir_param;
> +
> +/**
> + * pci_disable_acs_redir - disable ACS redirect capabilities
> + * @dev: the PCI device
> + *
> + * For only devices specified in the disable_acs_redir parameter.
> + */
> +static void pci_disable_acs_redir(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	const char *p;
> +	int pos;
> +	u16 ctrl;
> +
> +	if (!disable_acs_redir_param)
> +		return;
> +
> +	p = disable_acs_redir_param;
> +	while (*p) {
> +		ret = pci_dev_str_match(dev, p, &p);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			pr_info_once("PCI: Can't parse disable_acs_redir parameter: %s\n",
> +				     disable_acs_redir_param);
> +
> +			break;
> +		} else if (ret == 1) {
> +			/* Found a match */
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (*p != ';' && *p != ',') {
> +			/* End of param or invalid format */
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		p++;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ret != 1)
> +		return;
> +
> +	pos = pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ACS);
> +	if (!pos) {
> +		pci_warn(dev, "cannot disable ACS redirect for this hardware as it does not have ACS capabilities\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!pci_dev_specific_disable_acs_redir(dev))
> +		return;

Shouldn't this come before the above ACS capability test?  The PCH
quirk without a disable_acs_redir callback will fall out with the
pci_warn() above either way, but this ordering precludes that a quirk
could be written for that device since it doesn't have an ACS
capability.  Otherwise the series looks ok to me.  Thanks,

Alex

> +
> +	pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_ACS_CTRL, &ctrl);
> +
> +	/* P2P Request & Completion Redirect */
> +	ctrl &= ~(PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_EC);
> +
> +	pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_ACS_CTRL, ctrl);
> +
> +	pci_info(dev, "disabled ACS redirect\n");
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * pci_std_enable_acs - enable ACS on devices using standard ACS capabilites
>   * @dev: the PCI device
> @@ -3022,12 +3082,22 @@ static void pci_std_enable_acs(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  void pci_enable_acs(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  {
>  	if (!pci_acs_enable)
> -		return;
> +		goto disable_acs_redir;
>  
>  	if (!pci_dev_specific_enable_acs(dev))
> -		return;
> +		goto disable_acs_redir;
>  
>  	pci_std_enable_acs(dev);
> +
> +disable_acs_redir:
> +	/*
> +	 * Note: pci_disable_acs_redir() must be called even if
> +	 * ACS is not enabled by the kernel because the firmware
> +	 * may have unexpectedly set the flags. So if we are told
> +	 * to disable it, we should always disable it after setting
> +	 * the kernel's default preferences.
> +	 */
> +	pci_disable_acs_redir(dev);
>  }
>  
>  static bool pci_acs_flags_enabled(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 acs_flags)
> @@ -5967,6 +6037,8 @@ static int __init pci_setup(char *str)
>  				pcie_bus_config = PCIE_BUS_PEER2PEER;
>  			} else if (!strncmp(str, "pcie_scan_all", 13)) {
>  				pci_add_flags(PCI_SCAN_ALL_PCIE_DEVS);
> +			} else if (!strncmp(str, "disable_acs_redir=", 18)) {
> +				disable_acs_redir_param = str + 18;
>  			} else {
>  				printk(KERN_ERR "PCI: Unknown option `%s'\n",
>  						str);


  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-16 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-13 23:31 [PATCH v6 0/4] Add parameter for disabling ACS redirection for P2P Logan Gunthorpe
2018-07-13 23:31 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] PCI: Make specifying PCI devices in kernel parameters reusable Logan Gunthorpe
2018-07-13 23:31 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] PCI: Allow specifying devices using a base bus and path of devfns Logan Gunthorpe
2018-07-13 23:31 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] PCI: Introduce disable_acs_redir quirk Logan Gunthorpe
2018-07-13 23:31 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] PCI: Introduce the disable_acs_redir parameter Logan Gunthorpe
2018-07-16 17:15   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2018-07-16 17:17     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-07-16  5:01 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] Add parameter for disabling ACS redirection for P2P Alexey Kardashevskiy
2018-07-16 15:06   ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180716111543.6ddf584c@t450s.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).