From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: neilb@suse.com
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, tgraf@suug.ch,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH - revised] rhashtable: detect when object movement might have invalidated a lookup
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 23:43:29 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180719.234329.512279372120817504.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87va9aqv05.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 16:30:34 +1000
> Does this ruling also apply to the bit-spin-lock changes and the
> per-cpu-counter changes that I have proposed? These improve
> scalability when updates dominate. Not having these in mainline
> would mean I need to carry a separate rhashtables implementation for
> lustre, which means code diversion which isn't healthy in the long
> run.
If it helps existing rhashtable users generally, then it is fine,
since it will actually be tested by upstream users.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-20 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-01 4:44 [RFC PATCH 00/18] Assorted rhashtable improvements NeilBrown
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 11/18] rhashtable: further improve stability of rhashtable_walk NeilBrown
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 17/18] rhashtable: rename rht_for_each*continue as *from NeilBrown
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 10/18] rhashtable: remove rhashtable_walk_peek() NeilBrown
2018-06-02 15:48 ` Herbert Xu
2018-06-04 0:30 ` NeilBrown
2018-06-04 1:18 ` Tom Herbert
2018-06-04 2:09 ` NeilBrown
2018-06-04 21:31 ` Tom Herbert
2018-06-04 22:13 ` Tom Herbert
2018-06-05 1:24 ` NeilBrown
2018-06-05 1:00 ` NeilBrown
[not found] ` <CALx6S36Ce-rXQMzmFYZVPGD10Bo6udvRAHiZ5gWwnzVwoTVv0w@mail.gmail.com>
2018-06-06 5:07 ` NeilBrown
2018-06-07 2:45 ` [PATCH - RFC] rhashtable: add rhashtable_walk_last_seen() NeilBrown
2018-06-07 2:46 ` [PATCH - RFC] rhashtable: implement rhashtable_walk_peek() using rhashtable_walk_last_seen() NeilBrown
[not found] ` <CALx6S35GgUOd0dPgv7P96wNNTv5pN7fij0pcAoccqcSWZhvY7Q@mail.gmail.com>
2018-06-12 2:48 ` [PATCH RFC v2] " NeilBrown
2018-06-14 17:41 ` Tom Herbert
2018-06-15 4:23 ` Herbert Xu
2018-06-15 5:31 ` NeilBrown
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 18/18] rhashtable: add rhashtable_walk_delay_rehash() NeilBrown
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 14/18] rhashtable: allow rht_bucket_var to return NULL NeilBrown
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 15/18] rhashtable: use bit_spin_locks to protect hash bucket NeilBrown
2018-06-02 5:03 ` Herbert Xu
2018-06-02 9:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-06-04 0:25 ` NeilBrown
2018-06-04 2:52 ` [PATCH 15a/18] rhashtables: add lockdep tracking to bucket bit-spin-locks NeilBrown
2018-06-04 18:16 ` Simon Horman
2018-06-04 21:37 ` NeilBrown
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 01/18] rhashtable: silence RCU warning in rhashtable_test NeilBrown
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 07/18] rhashtable: use cmpxchg() to protect ->future_tbl NeilBrown
2018-06-01 16:44 ` Herbert Xu
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 13/18] rhashtable: don't hold lock on first table throughout insertion NeilBrown
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 16/18] rhashtable: allow percpu element counter NeilBrown
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 03/18] rhashtable: remove nulls_base and related code NeilBrown
2018-06-07 2:49 ` NeilBrown
2018-06-13 6:25 ` Herbert Xu
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 08/18] rhashtable: clean up dereference of ->future_tbl NeilBrown
2018-06-01 16:54 ` Herbert Xu
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 06/18] rhashtable: simplify nested_table_alloc() and rht_bucket_nested_insert() NeilBrown
2018-06-01 16:28 ` Herbert Xu
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 09/18] rhashtable: use cmpxchg() in nested_table_alloc() NeilBrown
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 05/18] rhashtable: simplify INIT_RHT_NULLS_HEAD() NeilBrown
2018-06-01 16:24 ` Herbert Xu
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 12/18] rhashtable: add rhashtable_walk_prev() NeilBrown
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 02/18] rhashtable: split rhashtable.h NeilBrown
2018-06-01 10:48 ` Herbert Xu
2018-06-01 4:44 ` [PATCH 04/18] rhashtable: detect when object movement might have invalidated a lookup NeilBrown
2018-06-01 16:06 ` Herbert Xu
2018-06-04 3:38 ` NeilBrown
2018-07-06 7:08 ` [PATCH resend] " NeilBrown
2018-07-12 5:46 ` David Miller
2018-07-12 5:48 ` David Miller
2018-07-15 23:55 ` NeilBrown
2018-07-15 23:57 ` [PATCH - revised] " NeilBrown
2018-07-16 0:51 ` Herbert Xu
2018-07-16 1:23 ` NeilBrown
2018-07-16 2:16 ` Herbert Xu
2018-07-16 3:26 ` NeilBrown
2018-07-17 6:30 ` Herbert Xu
2018-07-20 6:24 ` NeilBrown
2018-07-18 20:14 ` David Miller
2018-07-20 6:30 ` NeilBrown
2018-07-20 6:43 ` David Miller [this message]
2018-07-20 7:09 ` NeilBrown
2018-07-23 1:56 ` [PATCH net-next] rhashtable: detect when object movement between tables " NeilBrown
2018-07-26 20:55 ` David Miller
2018-07-26 22:04 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180719.234329.512279372120817504.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).