From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02AEECDFB8 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 21:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5102084C for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 21:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arista.com header.i=@arista.com header.b="nwywHYpk" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8C5102084C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=arista.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730876AbeGSVqz (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:46:55 -0400 Received: from mx.aristanetworks.com ([162.210.129.12]:59373 "EHLO prod-mx.aristanetworks.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727523AbeGSVqz (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:46:55 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 511 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:46:54 EDT Received: from prod-mx.aristanetworks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mx.aristanetworks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F02D10C3; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 13:53:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arista.com; s=Arista-A; t=1532033614; bh=fT4JI+vJ1G3qXT1/jFNxasArjdZvQQLQmN4wRLC9X+o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject; b=nwywHYpkaWVJI8bVzfL+1jvvNlTDg2kAPUGhGnOXOlIoDDskTGbWmbLu5VFZ4WNYJ uCXwRnorUNI/6BUkwxMOgpevW8FDs55tN67FceWvlCbc6zwVKSqrkG0HPmIogaYFhs oFwFdKSvDatR+LGoAnvu7DDurgbvjF6nJF3p86gxn1MFjah5jxstQpsncNh7tf174n IZM+JQpXnW77GY3IdNKaAAnujdyrPgOvvso9d2wT404Tub1B6KL4C214GDAMzZSwoR wggFPOkhpL6urVA4JjNiZ4WQdU15L5l19Lgg2p+qd5EJ+2YoCkwcSFBvRoKKZusfpI 99srOk6vNzDZw== Received: from visor (unknown [172.20.208.17]) by prod-mx.aristanetworks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80ED410BF; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 13:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 13:53:34 -0700 From: Ivan Delalande To: Al Viro Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] exec: don't force_sigsegv processes with a pending fatal signal Message-ID: <20180719205334.GA23942@visor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org We were seeing unexplained segfaults in coreutils processes and other basic utilities that we tracked down to binfmt_elf failing to load segments for ld.so. Digging further, the actual problem seems to occur when a process gets sigkilled while it is still being loaded by the kernel. In our case when _do_page_fault goes for a retry it will return early as it first checks for fatal_signal_pending(), so load_elf_interp also returns with error and as a result search_binary_handler will force_sigsegv() which is pretty confusing as nothing actually failed here. Fixes: 19d860a140be ("handle suicide on late failure exits in execve() in search_binary_handler()") Reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/14/5 Signed-off-by: Ivan Delalande --- fs/exec.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index 2d4e0075bd24..620d6489b61c 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c @@ -1657,7 +1657,8 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm) if (retval < 0 && !bprm->mm) { /* we got to flush_old_exec() and failed after it */ read_unlock(&binfmt_lock); - force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV, current); + if (!fatal_signal_pending(current)) + force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV, current); return retval; } if (retval != -ENOEXEC || !bprm->file) { -- 2.18.0