From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: joel@joelfernandes.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Make call_srcu() available during very early boot
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 13:24:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180814132453.093a4921@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180814170618.GA24813@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 10:06:18 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > #define __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name, pcpu_name) \
> > > - { \
> > > - .sda = &pcpu_name, \
> > > - .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.lock), \
> > > - .srcu_gp_seq_needed = 0 - 1, \
> > > - __SRCU_DEP_MAP_INIT(name) \
> > > - }
> > > +{ \
> > > + .sda = &pcpu_name, \
> > > + .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.lock), \
> > > + .srcu_gp_seq_needed = 0 - 1, \
> >
> > Interesting initialization of -1. This was there before, but still
> > interesting none the less.
>
> If I recall correctly, this subterfuge suppresses compiler complaints
> about initializing an unsigned long with a negative number. :-/
Did you try:
.srcu_gp_seq_needed = -1UL,
?
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-14 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-14 16:24 [PATCH RFC] Make call_srcu() available during very early boot Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-14 16:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-14 17:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-14 17:24 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2018-08-14 17:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-14 18:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-14 18:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-14 21:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-17 16:08 ` Tejun Heo
2018-08-17 16:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180814132453.093a4921@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).